Investigating the inclusion of ecosystem services in biodiversity offsetting

被引:38
作者
Jacob, Celine [1 ]
Vaissiere, Anne-Charlotte [2 ]
Bas, Adeline [3 ]
Calvet, Coralie [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Montpellier 3, EPHE, Univ Montpellier, CREOCEAN,CEFE UMR 5175,CNRS, Route Mende, F-34199 Montpellier 5, France
[2] Univ Montpellier, Fac Econ, UMR LAMETA 5474, Ave Raymond Dugrand, F-34960 Montpellier, France
[3] Univ Brest, UMR Amure, UMR M101, EDF Energies Nouvelles, 12 Rue Kergoat,Batiment B,CS 93837, F-29238 Brest 3, France
[4] Univ Avignon & Pays Vaucluse, UMR CNRS IRD 7263 237, Inst Mediterraneen Biodivers & Ecol, INRA Ecodev UR0767,IUT Avignon, Site Agroparc,BP 61207, F-84911 Avignon 09, France
关键词
Ecosystem services; Biodiversity offset; Mitigation hierarchy; Environmental Impact Assessment; No Net Loss; WETLAND MITIGATION; COMMUNITY; BENEFITS; IMPACTS; LOSSES; POLICY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.07.010
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
In response to growing international interest regarding the consideration of ecosystem services (ES) in the framework of biodiversity offsetting (BO) and the current lack of guidelines on the subject, we investigated the potential inclusion of ES in BO, highlighting the risks and opportunities. Our argument is premised on the assumption that a practical link already exists between the two and that most of the tools required to make this approach operational are available. But so far, ES are not explicitly taken into account when calculating and designing offsets (whether regulatory or voluntary). One way to integrate ES in BO is to use the Environmental Impact Assessments' framework, here we propose a logical way to integrate ES at each step of the implementation of the mitigation hierarchy and provide details on the links with existing practice. In our proposal, the inclusion of ES is presented as a way to complement current approaches based on the assessment of habitats/species/ecological functions rather than to replace them. We argue that measures proposed to offset biodiversity losses, in addition to respecting ecological performance standards, should equally be chosen to minimize residual losses of ES. The latter require offsetting by different types of complementary measures. Implementing these recommendations as good practice should strengthen the weight of biodiversity, demonstrate consideration of social equity, and result in better acceptance of development projects and the measures proposed to offset them. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:92 / 102
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Biodiversity offsetting and conservation: refraning nature to save it
    Apostolopoulou, Evangelia
    Adams, William M.
    ORYX, 2017, 51 (01) : 23 - 31
  • [32] A global snapshot of marine biodiversity offsetting policy
    Niner, Holly J.
    Milligan, Ben
    Jones, Peter J. S.
    Styan, Craig A.
    MARINE POLICY, 2017, 81 : 368 - 374
  • [33] Biodiversity and ecosystem services in the Campo Rupestre: A road map for the sustainability of the hottest Brazilian biodiversity hotspot
    Fernandes, G. Wilson
    Arantes-Garcia, Lucas
    Barbosa, Milton
    Barbosa, Newton P. U.
    Batista, Eugenia K. L.
    Beiroz, Wallace
    Resende, Fernando M.
    Abrahao, Anna
    Almada, Emmanuel D.
    Alves, Elaine
    Alves, Natacha J.
    Angrisano, Patricia
    Arista, Montserrat
    Arroyo, Juan
    Arruda, Andre Jardim
    Bahia, Thaise de Oliveira
    Braga, Laura
    Brito, Lilian
    Callisto, Marcos
    Caminha-Paiva, Dario
    Carvalho, Marilia
    Conceicao, Abel Augusto
    Costa, Leda N.
    Cruz, Antonio
    Cunha-Blum, Jessica
    Dagevos, John
    Dias, Braulio F. S.
    Pinto, Victor D.
    Dirzo, Rodolfo
    Domingos, Daniel Quedes
    Echternacht, Livia
    Fernandes, Stephannie
    Figueira, Jose Eugenio C.
    Fiorini, Cecilia F.
    Giulietti, Ana Maria
    Gomes, Augusto
    Gomes, Vanessa M.
    Gontijo, Bernardo
    Goulart, Fernando
    Guerra, Tadeu J.
    Junqueira, Patricia A.
    Lima-Santos, Debora
    Marques, Julia
    Meira-Neto, Joao
    Miola, Deise T. B.
    Morellato, Leonor Patricia C.
    Negreiros, Daniel
    Neire, Elizabeth
    Neves, Ana Carolina
    Neves, Frederico S.
    PERSPECTIVES IN ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION, 2020, 18 (04) : 213 - 222
  • [34] BIODIVERSITY OFFSETTING AND AGRICULTURE: IS THIS COMPATIBLE?
    Roussel, Sebastien
    Tardieu, Lea
    Vaissiere, Anne-Charlotte
    REVUE ECONOMIQUE, 2019, 70 (01): : 123 - 137
  • [35] Marine biodiversity and ecosystem services: an elusive link
    Duarte, CM
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MARINE BIOLOGY AND ECOLOGY, 2000, 250 (1-2) : 117 - 131
  • [36] Recent advances in the valuation of ecosystem services and biodiversity
    Atkinson, Giles
    Bateman, Ian
    Mourato, Susana
    OXFORD REVIEW OF ECONOMIC POLICY, 2012, 28 (01) : 22 - 47
  • [37] Beyond ecosystem services as justification for biodiversity conservation
    Prendergast, Kit S.
    AUSTRAL ECOLOGY, 2020, 45 (02) : 141 - 143
  • [38] BIODIVERSITY AND ECOSYSTEM SERVICES IN SUBSOIL AND TOPSOIL MANAGEMENT
    Rojas, Cesar
    Leonardo Bocanegra, Jose
    Mario de Posada, Juana
    OPERA-COLOMBIA, 2014, (14): : 9 - 26
  • [39] Ecosystem services and biodiversity conservation: concepts and a glossary
    Harrington, Richard
    Anton, Christian
    Dawson, Terence P.
    de Bello, Francesco
    Feld, Christian K.
    Haslett, John R.
    Kluvankova-Oravska, Tatiana
    Kontogianni, Areti
    Lavorel, Sandra
    Luck, Gary W.
    Rounsevell, Mark D. A.
    Samways, Michael J.
    Settele, Josef
    Skourtos, Michalis
    Spangenberg, Joachim H.
    Vandewalle, Marie
    Zobel, Martin
    Harrison, Paula A.
    BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2010, 19 (10) : 2773 - 2790
  • [40] Questioning the ecosystem services argument for biodiversity conservation
    Ridder, Ben
    BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2008, 17 (04) : 781 - 790