Investigating the inclusion of ecosystem services in biodiversity offsetting

被引:38
作者
Jacob, Celine [1 ]
Vaissiere, Anne-Charlotte [2 ]
Bas, Adeline [3 ]
Calvet, Coralie [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Montpellier 3, EPHE, Univ Montpellier, CREOCEAN,CEFE UMR 5175,CNRS, Route Mende, F-34199 Montpellier 5, France
[2] Univ Montpellier, Fac Econ, UMR LAMETA 5474, Ave Raymond Dugrand, F-34960 Montpellier, France
[3] Univ Brest, UMR Amure, UMR M101, EDF Energies Nouvelles, 12 Rue Kergoat,Batiment B,CS 93837, F-29238 Brest 3, France
[4] Univ Avignon & Pays Vaucluse, UMR CNRS IRD 7263 237, Inst Mediterraneen Biodivers & Ecol, INRA Ecodev UR0767,IUT Avignon, Site Agroparc,BP 61207, F-84911 Avignon 09, France
关键词
Ecosystem services; Biodiversity offset; Mitigation hierarchy; Environmental Impact Assessment; No Net Loss; WETLAND MITIGATION; COMMUNITY; BENEFITS; IMPACTS; LOSSES; POLICY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.07.010
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
In response to growing international interest regarding the consideration of ecosystem services (ES) in the framework of biodiversity offsetting (BO) and the current lack of guidelines on the subject, we investigated the potential inclusion of ES in BO, highlighting the risks and opportunities. Our argument is premised on the assumption that a practical link already exists between the two and that most of the tools required to make this approach operational are available. But so far, ES are not explicitly taken into account when calculating and designing offsets (whether regulatory or voluntary). One way to integrate ES in BO is to use the Environmental Impact Assessments' framework, here we propose a logical way to integrate ES at each step of the implementation of the mitigation hierarchy and provide details on the links with existing practice. In our proposal, the inclusion of ES is presented as a way to complement current approaches based on the assessment of habitats/species/ecological functions rather than to replace them. We argue that measures proposed to offset biodiversity losses, in addition to respecting ecological performance standards, should equally be chosen to minimize residual losses of ES. The latter require offsetting by different types of complementary measures. Implementing these recommendations as good practice should strengthen the weight of biodiversity, demonstrate consideration of social equity, and result in better acceptance of development projects and the measures proposed to offset them. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:92 / 102
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Offsetting impacts of development on biodiversity and ecosystem services
    Sonter, Laura J.
    Gordon, Ascelin
    Archibald, Carla
    Simmonds, Jeremy S.
    Ward, Michelle
    Metzger, Jean Paul
    Rhodes, Jonathan R.
    Maron, Martine
    AMBIO, 2020, 49 (04) : 892 - 902
  • [2] Offsetting impacts of development on biodiversity and ecosystem services
    Laura J. Sonter
    Ascelin Gordon
    Carla Archibald
    Jeremy S. Simmonds
    Michelle Ward
    Jean Paul Metzger
    Jonathan R. Rhodes
    Martine Maron
    Ambio, 2020, 49 : 892 - 902
  • [3] No net loss of what, for whom?: stakeholder perspectives to Biodiversity Offsetting in England
    Taherzadeh, Oliver
    Howley, Peter
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 20 (04) : 1807 - 1830
  • [4] Exploring the practical implementation of marine biodiversity offsetting in Australia
    Niner, Holly J.
    Jones, Peter J. S.
    Milligan, Ben
    Styan, Craig
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2021, 295
  • [5] A global overview of biodiversity offsetting governance
    Droste, Nils
    Olsson, Johanna Alkan
    Hanson, Helena
    Knaggard, Asa
    Lima, Guilherme
    Lundmark, Linda
    Thoni, Terese
    Zelli, Fariborz
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2022, 316
  • [6] Social impacts of biodiversity offsetting: A review
    Tupala, Anna-Kaisa
    Huttunen, Suvi
    Halme, Panu
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2022, 267
  • [7] Social Perceptions of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services in the Ecuadorian Amazon
    Caballero-Serrano, Veronica
    Alday, Josu G.
    Amigo, Javier
    Caballero, David
    Carlos Carrasco, Juan
    McLaren, Brian
    Onaindia, Miren
    HUMAN ECOLOGY, 2017, 45 (04) : 475 - 486
  • [8] Monitoring in biodiversity offsetting
    Moilanen, Atte
    Jalkanen, Joel
    Halme, Panu
    Nieminen, Eini
    Kotiaho, Janne S.
    Kujala, Heini
    GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION, 2024, 54
  • [9] Outcomes from 10 years of biodiversity offsetting
    Gibbons, Philip
    Macintosh, Andrew
    Constable, Amy Louise
    Hayashi, Kiichiro
    GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2018, 24 (02) : E643 - E654
  • [10] Calculation of biodiversity level between different land-uses to improve conservation outcomes of biodiversity offsetting
    Millon, Lara
    Barre, Kevin
    Julliard, Romain
    Compere, Pierre
    Kerbiriou, Christian
    LAND USE POLICY, 2021, 101