Chinese OFDI responses to the B&R initiative: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment

被引:54
|
作者
Shao, Xu [1 ]
机构
[1] Hubei Univ, Business Sch, Wuhan, Hubei, Peoples R China
关键词
Outward FDI; The belt and road initiative; Political risks; Chinese firms; International policy cooperation; FOREIGN DIRECT-INVESTMENT; LOCATION CHOICE; FDI; FIRMS; DETERMINANTS; CONFLICT; TREATIES; FLOWS; MODEL; BITS;
D O I
10.1016/j.chieco.2020.101435
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Based on an exogenous quasi-natural experiment, combined with administrative data from International Trade Statistics and the China Global Investment Tracker database, this study uses a difference-in-differences approach to examine whether the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) can help alleviate the negative effect of political risks in host countries on Chinese outward foreign direct investment (OFDI). The empirical findings are as follows. a) When controlling for firm-level and country-level variables and various fixed effects, high-level international political cooperation under the BRI can considerably increase Chinese OFDI. b) Political risks in host countries significantly reduce Chinese investment and increase losses, and the BRI mainly stimulates investment through mechanisms that seek to reduce policy uncertainty and political risks in host countries for Chinese firms. c) By further considering the gain (or loss) status of Chinese investment projects, the study shows that the BRI has a limited role in reducing investment losses. The study also performs a series of robustness tests to eliminate the influence of firm heterogeneity, informal political interference, and random effects. The overall results are consistent with those of the quasi-experiment.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Does the water resource 'fee to tax' policy alleviate water poverty? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment
    Mu, Lan
    Mou, Muge
    Tang, Heyan
    WATER SUPPLY, 2022, 22 (12) : 8465 - 8482
  • [42] Interaction effects of corporate hedging activities for a multi-risk exposure: evidence from a quasi-natural experiment
    Hang, Markus
    Geyer-Klingeberg, Jerome
    Rathgeber, Andreas W.
    Alasseur, Clemence
    Wichmann, Lena
    REVIEW OF QUANTITATIVE FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING, 2021, 56 (02) : 789 - 818
  • [43] Does individual investors' dividend tax influence analyst forecast? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China
    Liu, Guangqiang
    Liu, Tianbao
    FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2022, 50
  • [44] The effect of innovation-driven development on pollution reduction: Empirical evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China
    Gao, Kang
    Yuan, Yijun
    TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2021, 172 (172)
  • [45] How the COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts Green Inventions: Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment in China
    Wei, Xuan
    Liu, Ranran
    Chen, Wei
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (16)
  • [46] The Green Innovation Effect of Environmental Regulation: A Quasi-Natural Experiment from China
    Li, Jiaxin
    Zhan, Shaoguo
    Huang, Teng
    Nie, Debo
    ENERGIES, 2022, 15 (20)
  • [47] Environmental Protection tax and diversified transition of heavily polluting enterprises: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China
    Ren, Yangqiu
    Hu, Guoliu
    Wan, Qing
    ECONOMIC ANALYSIS AND POLICY, 2024, 81 : 1570 - 1592
  • [48] Can national forest city construction mitigate air pollution in China? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment
    Li, Xing
    Zhao, Chunkai
    ENVIRONMENTAL GEOCHEMISTRY AND HEALTH, 2023, 45 (06) : 3003 - 3024
  • [49] Stock market liberalization and corporate environmental violations: quasi-natural experiment from stock connect in China
    Liu, Sheng
    Lin, Xiao
    Chen, Xiuying
    NANKAI BUSINESS REVIEW INTERNATIONAL, 2025, 16 (01) : 58 - 78
  • [50] Corporate Digital Transformation and Green Innovation: A Quasi-Natural Experiment from Integration of Informatization and Industrialization in China
    Zhang, Qincheng
    Yang, Mingzeng
    Lv, Shanshan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (20)