The Duality of Reforestation Impacts on Surface and Air Temperature

被引:50
作者
Novick, Kimberly A. [1 ]
Katul, Gabriel G. [2 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ, ONeill Sch Publ & Environm Affairs, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Nicholas Sch Environm, Durham, NC 27708 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
SENSIBLE HEAT-FLUX; TERRESTRIAL ECOSYSTEMS; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; CLIMATE; ATMOSPHERE; VEGETATION; MOMENTUM; DEFORESTATION; EXTREMES; EXCHANGE;
D O I
10.1029/2019JG005543
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Evidence is mounting that temperate-zone reforestation cools surface temperature (T-surf), mitigating deleterious effects of climate warming. While T-surf drives many biophysical processes, air temperature (T-a) is an equally important target for climate mitigation and adaptation. Whether reductions in T-surf translate to reductions in T-a remains complex, fraught by several nonlinear and intertwined processes. In particular, forest canopy structure strongly affects near-surface temperature gradients, complicating cross-site comparison. Here the influence of reforestation on T-a is assessed by targeting temperature metrics that are less sensitive to local canopy effects. Specifically, we consider the aerodynamic temperature (T-aero), estimated using a novel procedure that does not rely on the assumptions of Monin-Obukhov similarity theory, as well as the extrapolated temperature into the surface layer (T-extrap). The approach is tested with flux tower data from a grass field, pine plantation, and mature hardwood stand co-located in the Duke Forest (North Carolina, USA). During growing season daytime periods, T-surf is 4-6 degrees C cooler, and T-aero and near-surface T-extrap are 2-3 degrees C cooler, in the forests relative to the grassland. During the dormant season, daytime differences are smaller but still substantial. At night, differences in T-aero are small, and near-surface T-extrap is warmer over forests than grasslands during the growing season (by 0.5 to 1 degrees C). Finally, the influence of land cover on T-extrap at the interface between the surface and mixed layer is small. Overall, reforestation appears to provide a meaningful opportunity for adaption to warmer daytime T-a in the southeastern United States, especially during the growing season. Plain Language Summary Reforestation-the process of reestablishing trees where they once dominated-has long been viewed as a strategy to remove CO2 from the atmosphere. Recently, attention has focused on understanding if reforestation also offers a direct temperature cooling benefit. By using more water (a cooling process) and increasing the transfer of heat energy away from the surface, forests may offer a meaningful opportunity for local climate mitigation and adaptation. Evidence is mounting that indeed, in the temperature and tropical zones, the surface of forests is cooler than grasslands and croplands. However, due to confounding effects of forest canopies on wind and temperature profiles near the surface, it has previously been hard to assess if forests also cool the air. Here we present a new approach that accounts for canopy effects, allowing for a more direct assessment of the potential for reforestation to cool near-surface air temperature. Using a case study from the North Carolina Piedmont, we find that while the air cooling effect of forests is not a large as the surface cooling effect, it is still on the order of 2-3 degrees C during summer daytime periods-times when the need for climate adaptation strategies are
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 57 条
  • [11] Cleugh HA, 2007, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V106, P285, DOI [10.1016/j.rse.2006.07.007, 10.1016/j.rse.2007.04.015]
  • [12] COSTA MH, 2005, INT HYDROL SER, P590
  • [13] Preferential cooling of hot extremes from cropland albedo management
    Davin, Edouard L.
    Seneviratne, Sonia I.
    Ciais, Philippe
    Olioso, Albert
    Wang, Tao
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2014, 111 (27) : 9757 - 9761
  • [14] Foley JA, 2003, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V1, P38, DOI 10.1890/1540-9295(2003)001[0038:GSHTEC]2.0.CO
  • [15] 2
  • [16] Effects of climate extremes on the terrestrial carbon cycle: concepts, processes and potential future impacts
    Frank, Dorothea
    Reichstein, Markus
    Bahn, Michael
    Thonicke, Kirsten
    Frank, David
    Mahecha, Miguel D.
    Smith, Pete
    Van der Velde, Marijn
    Vicca, Sara
    Babst, Flurin
    Beer, Christian
    Buchmann, Nina
    Canadell, Josep G.
    Ciais, Philippe
    Cramer, Wolfgang
    Ibrom, Andreas
    Miglietta, Franco
    Poulter, Ben
    Rammig, Anja
    Seneviratne, Sonia I.
    Walz, Ariane
    Wattenbach, Martin
    Zavala, Miguel A.
    Zscheischler, Jakob
    [J]. GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2015, 21 (08) : 2861 - 2880
  • [17] Uncertainties in CMIP5 Climate Projections due to Carbon Cycle Feedbacks
    Friedlingstein, Pierre
    Meinshausen, Malte
    Arora, Vivek K.
    Jones, Chris D.
    Anav, Alessandro
    Liddicoat, Spencer K.
    Knutti, Reto
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2014, 27 (02) : 511 - 526
  • [18] Direct climate effects of perennial bioenergy crops in the United States
    Georgescu, Matei
    Lobell, David B.
    Field, Christopher B.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2011, 108 (11) : 4307 - 4312
  • [19] Wind-induced leaf transpiration
    Huang, Cheng-Wei
    Chu, Chia-Ren
    Hsieh, Cheng-I
    Palmroth, Sari
    Katul, Gabriel G.
    [J]. ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES, 2015, 86 : 240 - 255
  • [20] ON THE DISPLACEMENT HEIGHT IN THE LOGARITHMIC VELOCITY PROFILE
    JACKSON, PS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 1981, 111 (OCT) : 15 - 25