Cochlear Implantation in Children with Postlingual Progressive Steeply Sloping High-Frequency Hearing Loss

被引:16
|
作者
Meredith, Margaret A. [1 ]
Rubinstein, Jay T. [2 ]
Sie, Kathleen C. Y. [1 ,2 ]
Norton, Susan J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Seattle Childrens Hosp, Childhood Commun Ctr, Seattle, WA 98105 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Dept Otolaryngol HNS, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
cochlear implants; hearing aids; hearing preservation; speech recognition; DEAD REGIONS; PRESERVATION OUTCOMES; IMPAIRED LISTENERS; ELECTRODE; RECOGNITION; ADOLESCENTS; AUDIBILITY; CANDIDATES; CI422; TESTS;
D O I
10.3766/jaaa.16115
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Background: Children with steeply sloping sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) lack access to critical high-frequency cues despite the use of advanced hearing aid technology. In addition, their auditory-only aided speech perception abilities often meet Food and Drug Administration criteria for cochlear implantation. Purpose: The objective of this study was to describe hearing preservation and speech perception outcomes in a group of young children with steeply sloping SNHL who received a cochlear implant (CI). Research Design: Retrospective case series. Study Sample: Eight children with steeply sloping postlingual progressive SNHL who received a unilateral traditional CI at Seattle Children's Hospital between 2009 and 2013 and had follow-up data available up to 24 mo postimplant were included. Data Collection and Analysis: A retrospective chart review was completed. Medical records were reviewed for demographic information, preoperative and postoperative behavioral hearing thresholds, and speech perception scores. Paired t tests were used to analyze speech perception data. Hearing preservation results are reported. Results: Rapid improvement of speech perception scores was observed within the first month postimplant for all participants. Mean monosyllabic word scores were 76% and mean phoneme scores were 86.7% at 1-mo postactivation compared to mean preimplant scores of 19.5% and 31.0%, respectively. Hearing preservation was observed in five participants out to 24-mo postactivation. Two participants lost hearing in both the implanted and unimplanted ear, and received a sequential bilateral CI in the other ear after progression of the hearing loss. One participant had a total loss of hearing in only the implanted ear. Results reported in this article are from the ear implanted first. Bilateral outcomes are not reported. Conclusions: CIs provided benefit for children with steeply sloping bilateral hearing loss for whom hearing aids did not provide adequate auditory access. In our cohort, significant improvements in speech understanding occurred rapidly postactivation. Preservation of residual hearing in children with a traditional CI electrode is possible.
引用
收藏
页码:913 / 919
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Cochlear Implantation in Adults With Asymmetric Hearing Loss
    Firszt, Jill B.
    Holden, Laura K.
    Reeder, Ruth M.
    Cowdrey, Lisa
    King, Sarah
    EAR AND HEARING, 2012, 33 (04) : 521 - 533
  • [22] Early Outcomes After Cochlear Implantation for Adults and Children With Unilateral Hearing Loss
    Sladen, Douglas P.
    Carlson, Matthew L.
    Dowling, Brittany P.
    Olund, Amy P.
    Teece, Kathryn
    DeJong, Melissa D.
    Breneman, Alyce
    Peterson, Ann
    Beatty, Charles W.
    Neff, Brian A.
    Driscoll, Colin L.
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2017, 127 (07) : 1683 - 1688
  • [23] A Within-Subject Comparison of Bimodal Hearing, Bilateral Cochlear Implantation, and Bilateral Cochlear Implantation With Bilateral Hearing Preservation: High-Performing Patients
    Gifford, Rene H.
    Driscoll, Colin L. W.
    Davis, Timothy J.
    Fiebig, Pam
    Micco, Alan
    Dorman, Michael F.
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2015, 36 (08) : 1331 - 1337
  • [24] A Phoneme Perception Test Method for High-Frequency Hearing Aid Fitting
    Schmitt, Nicola
    Winkler, Alexandra
    Boretzki, Michael
    Holube, Inga
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF AUDIOLOGY, 2016, 27 (05) : 367 - 379
  • [25] A review of the outcomes of children with designated additional needs receiving cochlear implantation for severe to profound hearing loss
    Rawes, Catherine
    Ngaage, Ledibabari M.
    Mackenzie, Robert
    Martin, Jane
    Cordingley, Angela
    Raine, Chris
    COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 22 (06) : 338 - 344
  • [26] The effects of high-frequency amplification on the objective and subjective performance of hearing instrument users with varying degrees of high-frequency hearing loss
    Plyler, PN
    Fleck, EL
    JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2006, 49 (03): : 616 - 627
  • [27] Examining the Impact of Cochlear Implantation on the Early Gross Motor Development of Children With a Hearing Loss
    De Kegel, Alexandra
    Maes, Leen
    Van Waelvelde, Hilde
    Dhooge, Ingeborg
    EAR AND HEARING, 2015, 36 (03) : E113 - E121
  • [28] The impact of cochlear implantation on speech and language outcomes in children with asymmetric sensorineural hearing loss
    Malhotra, Prashant S.
    Densky, Jaron
    Melachuri, Manasa
    Melachuri, Samyuktha
    Onwuka, Amanda
    Winner, Krista
    Lucius, Shana
    Findlen, Ursula
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2022, 152
  • [29] A Scoping Review of Studies Comparing Outcomes for Children With Severe Hearing Loss Using Hearing Aids to Children With Cochlear Implants
    Killan, Catherine F.
    Hoare, Derek J.
    Katiri, Roulla
    Pierzycki, Robert H.
    Adams, Bethany
    Hartley, Douglas E. H.
    Ropar, Danielle
    Kitterick, Padraig T.
    EAR AND HEARING, 2022, 43 (02) : 290 - 304
  • [30] Discrimination of Japanese monosyllables in patients with high-frequency hearing loss
    Karino, Shotaro
    Usami, Shin-ichi
    Kumakawa, Kozo
    Takahashi, Haruo
    Tono, Tetsuya
    Naito, Yasushi
    Doi, Katsumi
    Ito, Ken
    Suzuki, Mitsuya
    Sakata, Hideaki
    Takumi, Yutaka
    Iwasaki, Satoshi
    Kakigi, Akinobu
    Yamasoba, Tatsuya
    AURIS NASUS LARYNX, 2016, 43 (03) : 269 - 280