Evidence Check: knowledge brokering to commission research reviews for policy

被引:44
作者
Campbell, Danielle [1 ]
Donald, Braedon [1 ]
Moore, Gabriel [1 ]
Frew, Deborah [1 ]
机构
[1] Sax Inst, Sydney, NSW, Australia
来源
EVIDENCE & POLICY | 2011年 / 7卷 / 01期
关键词
synthesis; knowledge brokering; research utilisation; evidence-based policy; SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS; HEALTH; TIME;
D O I
10.1332/174426411X553034
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Evidence Check, a programme managed by the Sax Institute in Sydney, Australia, assists Australian policy makers to commission quality reviews of research to inform health policy decision making. The programme involves an iterative knowledge brokering process to formulate and refine the scope of and questions for the review. The knowledge brokering process is particularly important to overcome barriers that have traditionally impeded the use of evidence in policy decision making by facilitating the creation of linkages and exchange between policy and researchers. Feedback from policy makers and researchers indicates that the use of knowledge brokers has enhanced the value of reviews commissioned through Evidence Check
引用
收藏
页码:97 / 107
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   A Call for Mini-Reviews: An Effective but Underutilized Method of Synthesizing Knowledge to Inform and Direct Fisheries Management, Policy, and Research [J].
Donaldson, M. R. ;
Aday, D. D. ;
Cooke, S. J. .
FISHERIES, 2011, 36 (03) :123-129
[32]   Using knowledge brokering activities to promote allied health clinicians' engagement in research: a qualitative exploration [J].
Mickan, S. ;
Wenke, Rachel ;
Weir, Kelly ;
Bialocerkowski, Andrea ;
Noble, Christy .
BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (04)
[33]   A comparative ethnographic study of collective knowledge brokering across the syntactic, semantic and pragmatic knowledge boundaries in applied health research [J].
Waring, Justin ;
Clarke, Jenelle ;
Vickers, Rob .
EVIDENCE & POLICY, 2021, 17 (01) :111-130
[34]   Institutionalising evidence-based policy: international insights into knowledge brokerage [J].
Lenihan, Ashley Thomas .
CONTEMPORARY SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2015, 10 (02) :114-125
[35]   Performing collaborative research: a dramaturgical reflection on an institutional knowledge brokering service in the North East of England [J].
van der Graaf, Peter ;
Shucksmith, Janet ;
Rushmer, Rosemary ;
Rhodes, Avril ;
Welford, Mark .
HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMS, 2019, 17 (1)
[36]   Knowledge brokering on emissions modelling in Strategic Environmental Assessment of Estonian energy policy with special reference to the LEAP model [J].
Kuldna, Piret ;
Peterson, Kaja ;
Kuhi-Thalfeldt, Reeli .
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2015, 54 :55-60
[37]   The EPIQ evidence reviews - practical tools for an integrated approach to knowledge translation [J].
Lee, Shoo K. ;
Singhal, Nalini ;
Aziz, Khalid ;
Cronin, Catherine M. .
PAEDIATRICS & CHILD HEALTH, 2011, 16 (10) :629-+
[38]   Fugitive Futures and Knowledge Brokering: Adding Value, Habits, and Trust in Early Childhood Education and Educational Research [J].
Reinertsen, Anne B. ;
Ulla, Bente ;
Larsen, Ann Sofi ;
Moxnes, Anna R. ;
Aslanian, Teresa K. ;
Andersen, Camilla Eline .
QUALITATIVE INQUIRY, 2022, 28 (8-9) :874-887
[39]   Collaborative development and implementation of a knowledge brokering program to promote research use in Burkina Faso, West Africa [J].
Dagenais, Christian ;
Some, Telesphore D. ;
Boileau-Falardeau, Michele ;
McSween-Cadieux, Esther ;
Ridde, Valery .
GLOBAL HEALTH ACTION, 2015, 8 :1-11
[40]   Evaluating the evidence in evidence-based policy and practice: Examples from systematic reviews of literature [J].
See, Beng Huat .
RESEARCH IN EDUCATION, 2018, 102 (01) :37-61