Evidence Check: knowledge brokering to commission research reviews for policy

被引：44
作者：
Campbell, Danielle [1 ]
Donald, Braedon [1 ]
Moore, Gabriel [1 ]
Frew, Deborah [1 ]
机构：
[1] Sax Inst, Sydney, NSW, Australia
来源：
EVIDENCE & POLICY | 2011年 / 7卷 / 01期
关键词：
synthesis; knowledge brokering; research utilisation; evidence-based policy; SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS; HEALTH; TIME;
D O I：
10.1332/174426411X553034
中图分类号：
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号：
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要：
Evidence Check, a programme managed by the Sax Institute in Sydney, Australia, assists Australian policy makers to commission quality reviews of research to inform health policy decision making. The programme involves an iterative knowledge brokering process to formulate and refine the scope of and questions for the review. The knowledge brokering process is particularly important to overcome barriers that have traditionally impeded the use of evidence in policy decision making by facilitating the creation of linkages and exchange between policy and researchers. Feedback from policy makers and researchers indicates that the use of knowledge brokers has enhanced the value of reviews commissioned through Evidence Check
引用
收藏
页码：97 / 107
页数：11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Knowledge Brokering Repertoires: Academic Practices at Science-Policy Interfaces as an Epistemological Bricolage
    Bandola-Gill, Justyna
    MINERVA, 2023, 61 (01) : 71 - 92
  • [22] Knowledge Brokering Repertoires: Academic Practices at Science-Policy Interfaces as an Epistemological Bricolage
    Justyna Bandola-Gill
    Minerva, 2023, 61 : 71 - 92
  • [23] Do we need “more research” or better implementation through knowledge brokering?
    Janet G. Hering
    Sustainability Science, 2016, 11 : 363 - 369
  • [24] Do we need "more research" or better implementation through knowledge brokering?
    Hering, Janet G.
    SUSTAINABILITY SCIENCE, 2016, 11 (02) : 363 - 369
  • [25] Entangled evidence: knowledge making in systematic reviews in healthcare
    Moreira, Tiago
    SOCIOLOGY OF HEALTH & ILLNESS, 2007, 29 (02) : 180 - 197
  • [26] Knowledge brokering to bridge the research-practice gap in education: Where are we now?
    Rycroft-Smith, Lucy
    REVIEW OF EDUCATION, 2022, 10 (01):
  • [27] "Check Consumer Policy and Consumer Participation" - Recommendations for evidence-based Consumer Policy
    Hagen, Kornelia
    Micklitz, Hans-W.
    Oehler, Andreas
    Reisch, Lucia A.
    Struenck, Christoph
    JOURNAL FUR VERBRAUCHERSCHUTZ UND LEBENSMITTELSICHERHEIT-JOURNAL OF CONSUMER PROTECTION AND FOOD SAFETY, 2013, 8 (1-2): : 61 - 66
  • [28] Evidence synthesis for knowledge exchange: balancing responsiveness and quality in providing evidence for policy and practice
    Morton, Sarah
    Seditas, Karen
    EVIDENCE & POLICY, 2018, 14 (01): : 155 - 167
  • [29] Knowledge gaps in diabetes research: an evidence mapping of the literature
    Esmaeili, Shahnaz
    Bandarian, Fatemeh
    Gharishvandi, Fatemeh
    Razi, Farideh
    Hosseinkhani, Shaghayegh
    Namazi, Nazli
    Esmaeili, Behnaz
    Sanjari, Mahnaz
    Tootee, Ali
    Saeedi, Saeedeh
    Rambod, Camelia
    Aalaa, Maryam
    Fahimfar, Noushin
    Larijani, Bagher
    Nasli-Esfahani, Ensieh
    JOURNAL OF DIABETES AND METABOLIC DISORDERS, 2022, 21 (01) : 1139 - 1148
  • [30] Improving the evidence base for energy policy: The role of systematic reviews
    Sorrell, Steve
    ENERGY POLICY, 2007, 35 (03) : 1858 - 1871
12345