Evidence Check: knowledge brokering to commission research reviews for policy

被引：44

作者：

Campbell, Danielle ^{[1
]}

Donald, Braedon ^{[1
]}

Moore, Gabriel ^{[1
]}

Frew, Deborah ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Sax Inst, Sydney, NSW, Australia

来源：

EVIDENCE & POLICY | 2011年 / 7卷 / 01期

关键词：

synthesis; knowledge brokering; research utilisation; evidence-based policy; SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS; HEALTH; TIME;

D O I：

10.1332/174426411X553034

中图分类号：

C [社会科学总论];

学科分类号：

03 ; 0303 ;

摘要：

Evidence Check, a programme managed by the Sax Institute in Sydney, Australia, assists Australian policy makers to commission quality reviews of research to inform health policy decision making. The programme involves an iterative knowledge brokering process to formulate and refine the scope of and questions for the review. The knowledge brokering process is particularly important to overcome barriers that have traditionally impeded the use of evidence in policy decision making by facilitating the creation of linkages and exchange between policy and researchers. Feedback from policy makers and researchers indicates that the use of knowledge brokers has enhanced the value of reviews commissioned through Evidence Check

引用

页码：97 / 107

页数：11

共 50 条

[21] Knowledge Brokering Repertoires: Academic Practices at Science-Policy Interfaces as an Epistemological Bricolage [J].

Bandola-Gill, Justyna .

MINERVA, 2023, 61 (01) :71-92

[22] Knowledge Brokering Repertoires: Academic Practices at Science-Policy Interfaces as an Epistemological Bricolage [J].

Justyna Bandola-Gill .

Minerva, 2023, 61 :71-92

[23] Do we need “more research” or better implementation through knowledge brokering? [J].

Janet G. Hering .

Sustainability Science, 2016, 11 :363-369

[24] Do we need "more research" or better implementation through knowledge brokering? [J].

Hering, Janet G. .

SUSTAINABILITY SCIENCE, 2016, 11 (02) :363-369

[25] Entangled evidence: knowledge making in systematic reviews in healthcare [J].

Moreira, Tiago .

SOCIOLOGY OF HEALTH & ILLNESS, 2007, 29 (02) :180-197

[26] Knowledge brokering to bridge the research-practice gap in education: Where are we now? [J].

Rycroft-Smith, Lucy .

REVIEW OF EDUCATION, 2022, 10 (01)

[27] "Check Consumer Policy and Consumer Participation" - Recommendations for evidence-based Consumer Policy [J].

Hagen, Kornelia ;

Micklitz, Hans-W. ;

Oehler, Andreas ;

Reisch, Lucia A. ;

Struenck, Christoph .

JOURNAL FUR VERBRAUCHERSCHUTZ UND LEBENSMITTELSICHERHEIT-JOURNAL OF CONSUMER PROTECTION AND FOOD SAFETY, 2013, 8 (1-2) :61-66

[28] Evidence synthesis for knowledge exchange: balancing responsiveness and quality in providing evidence for policy and practice [J].

Morton, Sarah ;

Seditas, Karen .

EVIDENCE & POLICY, 2018, 14 (01) :155-167

[29] Knowledge gaps in diabetes research: an evidence mapping of the literature [J].

Esmaeili, Shahnaz ;

Bandarian, Fatemeh ;

Gharishvandi, Fatemeh ;

Razi, Farideh ;

Hosseinkhani, Shaghayegh ;

Namazi, Nazli ;

Esmaeili, Behnaz ;

Sanjari, Mahnaz ;

Tootee, Ali ;

Saeedi, Saeedeh ;

Rambod, Camelia ;

Aalaa, Maryam ;

Fahimfar, Noushin ;

Larijani, Bagher ;

Nasli-Esfahani, Ensieh .

JOURNAL OF DIABETES AND METABOLIC DISORDERS, 2022, 21 (01) :1139-1148

[30] Improving the evidence base for energy policy: The role of systematic reviews [J].

Sorrell, Steve .

ENERGY POLICY, 2007, 35 (03) :1858-1871

← 1 2 3 4 5 →