Evidence Check: knowledge brokering to commission research reviews for policy

被引：44
|
作者：
Campbell, Danielle [1 ]
Donald, Braedon [1 ]
Moore, Gabriel [1 ]
Frew, Deborah [1 ]
机构：
[1] Sax Inst, Sydney, NSW, Australia
来源：
EVIDENCE & POLICY | 2011年 / 7卷 / 01期
关键词：
synthesis; knowledge brokering; research utilisation; evidence-based policy; SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS; HEALTH; TIME;
D O I：
10.1332/174426411X553034
中图分类号：
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号：
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要：
Evidence Check, a programme managed by the Sax Institute in Sydney, Australia, assists Australian policy makers to commission quality reviews of research to inform health policy decision making. The programme involves an iterative knowledge brokering process to formulate and refine the scope of and questions for the review. The knowledge brokering process is particularly important to overcome barriers that have traditionally impeded the use of evidence in policy decision making by facilitating the creation of linkages and exchange between policy and researchers. Feedback from policy makers and researchers indicates that the use of knowledge brokers has enhanced the value of reviews commissioned through Evidence Check
引用
收藏
页码：97 / 107
页数：11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Does knowledge brokering facilitate evidence-based policy? A review of existing knowledge and an agenda for future research
    MacKillop, Eleanor
    Quarmby, Sarah
    Downe, James
    POLICY AND POLITICS, 2020, 48 (02): : 335 - 353
  • [2] Deconstructing knowledge brokering for commissioned rapid reviews: an observational study
    G. Moore
    S. Redman
    P. Butow
    A. Haynes
    Health Research Policy and Systems, 16
  • [3] Deconstructing knowledge brokering for commissioned rapid reviews: an observational study
    Moore, G.
    Redman, S.
    Butow, P.
    Haynes, A.
    HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMS, 2018, 16
  • [4] BRIDGING THE SCIENCE-POLICY INTERFACE: A NEW ERA FOR SOUTH AFRICAN RESEARCH AND THE ROLE OF KNOWLEDGE BROKERING
    Godfrey, Linda
    Funke, Nikki
    Mbizvo, Carmel
    SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF SCIENCE, 2010, 106 (5-6) : 34 - 41
  • [5] Rapid reviews in health policy: a study of intended use in the New South Wales' Evidence Check programme
    Moore, Gabriel Mary
    Redman, Sally
    Turner, Tari
    Haines, Mary
    EVIDENCE & POLICY, 2016, 12 (04): : 505 - 519
  • [6] Experiences of knowledge brokering for evidence-informed public health policy and practice: three years of the Scottish Collaboration for Public Health Research and Policy
    Frost, Helen
    Geddes, Rosemary
    Haw, Sally
    Jackson, Caroline A.
    Jepson, Ruth
    Mooney, John D.
    Frank, John
    EVIDENCE & POLICY, 2012, 8 (03): : 347 - 359
  • [7] Evidence maps and evidence gaps: evidence review mapping as a method for collating and appraising evidence reviews to inform research and policy
    O'Leary, Bethan C.
    Woodcock, Paul
    Kaiser, Michel J.
    Pullin, Andrew S.
    ENVIRONMENTAL EVIDENCE, 2017, 6 (01)
  • [8] Knowledge brokering organisations: a new way of governing evidence
    MacKillop, Eleanor
    Downe, James
    EVIDENCE & POLICY, 2023, 19 (01): : 22 - 41
  • [9] Knowledge brokering inside the policy making process: an analysis of evidence use inside a UK government department
    Shaxson, Louise
    Hood, Rick
    Boaz, Annette
    Head, Brian
    EVIDENCE & POLICY, 2025, 21 (01): : 6 - 25
  • [10] Bringing research into policy: understanding context-specific requirements for productive knowledge brokering inE legislatures
    Karaulova, Maria
    Edler, Jakob
    EVIDENCE & POLICY, 2024, 20 (04): : 504 - 530
12345