Lung tumor reproducibility with active breath control (ABC) in image-guided radiotherapy based on cone-beam computed tomography with two registration methods

被引:33
作者
Wang, Xin [1 ,2 ]
Zhong, Renming [1 ]
Bai, Sen [1 ]
Xu, Qingfeng [1 ]
Zhao, Yaqin [1 ]
Wang, Jin [1 ]
Jiang, Xiaoqin [1 ]
Shen, Yali [1 ]
Xu, Feng [1 ]
Wei, Yuquan [2 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, State Key Lab Biotherapy, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, Peoples R China
关键词
Cone-beam CT; Tumor reproducibility; ABC; Registration; REAL-TIME TUMOR; STEREOTACTIC RADIOTHERAPY; CT; IMMOBILIZATION; REDUCTION; GUIDANCE; POSITION; MARGIN; MOTION; UNCERTAINTIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.radonc.2011.05.020
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To study the inter- and intrafraction tumor reproducibility with active breath control (ABC) utilizing cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), and compare validity of registration with two different regions of interest (ROI). Methods and materials: Thirty-one lung tumors in 19 patients received conventional or stereotactic body radiotherapy with ABC. During each treatment, patients had three CBCT scanned before and after online position correction and after treatment. These CBCT images were aligned to the planning CT using the gray scale registration of tumor and bony registration of the thorax, and tumor position uncertainties were then determined. Results: The interfraction systematic and random translation errors in the left-right (LR), superior-inferior (SI) and anterior-posterior (AP) directions were 3.6, 4.8, and 2.9 mm; 2.5, 4.5, and 3.5 mm, respectively, with gray scale alignment; 1.9, 4.3, 2.0 mm and 2.5, 4.4, 2.9 mm, respectively, with bony alignment. The interfraction systematic and random rotation errors with gray scale and bony alignment groups ranged from 1.4 degrees to 3.0 degrees and 0.8 degrees to 2.3 degrees, respectively. The intrafraction systematic and random errors with gray scale registration in LR, SI, AP directions were 0.9, 2.0, 1.8 mm and 1.5, 1.7, 2.9 mm, respectively, for translation; 1.5 degrees, 0.9 degrees, 1.0 degrees and 1.2 degrees, 2.2 degrees, 1.8 degrees, respectively, for rotation. The translational errors in SI direction with bony alignment were significantly larger than that of gray scale (p < 0.05). Conclusions: With CBCT guided online correction the interfraction positioning errors can be markedly reduced. The intrafraction errors were not diminished by the use of ABC. Rotation errors were not very remarkable both inter- and intrafraction. Gray scale alignment of tumor may provide a better registration in SI direction. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved. Radiotherapy and Oncology 99 (2011) 148-154
引用
收藏
页码:148 / 154
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A prospective study to assess and quantify the setup errors with cone-beam computed tomography in head-and-neck cancer image-guided radiotherapy treatment
    Jain, Vidhi
    Soni, Tej Prakash
    Singh, Dinesh Kumar
    Patni, Nidhi
    Jakhotia, Naresh
    Gupta, Anil Kumar
    Gupta, Tara Chand
    Singhal, Harish
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS, 2023, 19 (03) : 783 - 787
  • [22] Target volume motion during anal cancer image guided radiotherapy using cone-beam computed tomography
    Brooks, Corrinne J.
    Bernier, Laurence
    Hansen, Vibeke N.
    Tait, Diana M.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2018, 91 (1085)
  • [23] Personalized Assessment of kV Cone Beam Computed Tomography Doses in Image-guided Radiotherapy of Pediatric Cancer Patients
    Zhang, Yibao
    Yan, Yulong
    Nath, Ravinder
    Bao, Shanglian
    Deng, Jun
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2012, 83 (05): : 1649 - 1654
  • [24] IMAGE-GUIDED RADIOTHERAPY (IGRT) FOR PROSTATE CANCER COMPARING kV IMAGING OF FIDUCIAL MARKERS WITH CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY (CBCT)
    Barney, Brandon M.
    Lee, R. Jeffrey
    Handrahan, Diana
    Welsh, Keith T.
    Cook, J. Taylor
    Sause, William T.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2011, 80 (01): : 301 - 305
  • [25] Inter-breath-hold motion in gated cone-beam CT introducing uncertainties in image-guided radiotherapy for breath-hold treatment
    Zhuang, Tingliang
    Magnelli, Anthony
    Liu, Han
    Qi, Peng
    Djemil, Toufik
    Stephans, Kevin
    Videtic, Gregory
    Xia, Ping
    JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2014, 3 (03) : 321 - 330
  • [26] 2D-3D radiograph to cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) registration for C-arm image-guided robotic surgery
    Liu, Wen Pei
    Otake, Yoshito
    Azizian, Mahdi
    Wagner, Oliver J.
    Sorger, Jonathan M.
    Armand, Mehran
    Taylor, Russell H.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED RADIOLOGY AND SURGERY, 2015, 10 (08) : 1239 - 1252
  • [27] Image-guided radiotherapy via daily online cone-beam CT substantially reduces margin requirements for stereotactic lung radiotherapy
    Grills, Inga S.
    Hugo, Geoffrey
    Kestfn, Larry L.
    Galerani, Ana Paula
    Chao, K. Kenneth
    Wloch, Jennifer
    Yan, Di
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2008, 70 (04): : 1045 - 1056
  • [28] Feasibility study of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) reconstruction algorithm for proton image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT)
    Han, Dong-Kyoon
    Jo, Byungdu
    Lee, Min-Hee
    Yoo, Myung Seok
    Kim, Kyuseok
    Lee, Youngjin
    OPTIK, 2016, 127 (20): : 9691 - 9694
  • [29] Optimal Image-Guidance Scenario With Cone-Beam Computed Tomography in Conventionally Fractionated Radiotherapy for Lung Tumors
    Yeung, Anamaria R.
    Li, Jonathan
    Shi, Wenyin
    Newlin, Heather
    Morris, Christopher G.
    Samant, Sanjiv
    Saito, Anneyuko
    Chvetsov, Alexei
    Liu, Chihray
    Palta, Jatinder
    Olivier, Kenneth
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2010, 33 (03): : 276 - 280
  • [30] Surgeon radiation exposure in cone beam computed tomography-based, image-guided spinal surgery
    Nottmeier, Eric W.
    Bowman, Cammi
    Nelson, Kevin L.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2012, 8 (02) : 196 - 200