Reconstruction of the ACL with a semitendinosus tendon graft: a prospective randomized single blinded comparison of double-bundle versus single-bundle technique in male athletes

被引:124
作者
Streich, Nikolaus A. [1 ]
Friedrich, Kilian [1 ]
Gotterbarm, Tobias [1 ]
Schmitt, Holger [1 ]
机构
[1] Heidelberg Univ, Dept Orthopaed Sports Med, D-69118 Heidelberg, Germany
关键词
anterior cruciate ligament; double bundle reconstruction; male; prospective randomized study; semitendinosus tendon;
D O I
10.1007/s00167-007-0480-z
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in double-bundle technique is advocated to more closely restore the anatomy and function of the native ligament than conventional single-bundle technique. But up to now there are only a few clinical investigations comparing both techniques in a prospective manner. We hypothesized that double-bundle ACL reconstruction reveals superior clinical and subjective results compared to single-bundle technique in a high-demand collective. A total of 50 male patients (mean age 29.4 years) were prospectively randomized consecutively into one of the two reconstruction techniques. Group 1 (SB) underwent a 4-stranded single-bundle reconstruction with a ST graft in femoral position at 10:00 and 02:00 o'clock, respectively. In group 2 (DB), reconstruction was performed by using a 2-stranded ST graft with double-bundle, four tunnel technique. Before surgery and at a 2 year follow-up (range 23-25 months) patients were evaluated by the same blinded observer. There was no significant difference in the side-to-side anterior laxity-measurement with the KT-1000 between both groups. As evaluated by the pivot shift, no significant correlation could be noted (Fisher exact test P = 0.098) between rotational stability and any of the both reconstruction techniques. However, the anterior and rotational stability improved significantly at 2-year follow-up compared to preoperatively (P = 0.003) in both groups. The statistical analysis showed a significant increase for the IKDC (subjective, objective) and the Lysholm Score at final follow-up among each single technique, while we found no significant difference between the two reconstruction methods. On the basis of our investigation, we conclude that reconstruction of the ACL by a double-bundle ST graft with an extracortical anchorage can achieve excellent clinical results. But in contrast to our initial hypothesis, we could not quote any significant advantages by creating two independent bundles. Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament in conventional single-bundle technique with a more horizontal femoral tunnel placement obtains comparable clinical results in the present high-demand collective.
引用
收藏
页码:232 / 238
页数:7
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament -: Single- versus double-bundle multistranded hamstring tendons
    Adachi, N
    Ochi, M
    Uchio, Y
    Iwasa, J
    Kuriwaka, M
    Ito, Y
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2004, 86B (04): : 515 - 520
  • [2] Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Bone-patellar tendon-bone compared with double semitendinosus and gracilis tendon grafts - A prospective, randomized clinical trial
    Aglietti, P
    Giron, F
    Buzzi, R
    Biddau, F
    Sasso, F
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2004, 86A (10) : 2143 - 2155
  • [3] Single- and double-incision double-bundle ACL reconstruction
    Aglietti, Paolo
    Giron, Francesco
    Cuomo, Pierluigi
    Losco, Michele
    Mondanelli, Nicola
    [J]. CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2007, (454) : 108 - 113
  • [4] Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament in females: A comparison of hamstring versus patellar tendon autograft
    Barrett, GR
    Noojin, FK
    Hartzog, CW
    Nash, CR
    [J]. ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2002, 18 (01) : 46 - 54
  • [5] Anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Buoncristiani, Anthony M.
    Tjoumakaris, Fotios P.
    Starman, James S.
    Ferretti, Mario
    Fu, Freddie H.
    [J]. ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2006, 22 (09) : 1000 - 1006
  • [6] Arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament - A comparison of patellar tendon autograft and four-strand hamstring tendon autograft
    Corry, IS
    Webb, JM
    Clingeleffer, AJ
    Pinczewski, LA
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 1999, 27 (04) : 444 - 454
  • [7] Anatomic double bundle ACL reconstruction: a literature review
    Crawford, Charles
    Nyland, John
    Landes, Sarah
    Jackson, Richard
    Chang, Haw Chong
    Nawab, Akbar
    Caborn, David N. M.
    [J]. KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2007, 15 (08) : 946 - 964
  • [8] Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A metaanalysis comparing patellar tendon and hamstring tendon autografts
    Freedman, KB
    D'Amato, MJ
    Nedeff, DD
    Kaz, A
    Bach, BR
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2003, 31 (01) : 2 - 11
  • [9] Fu FH, 2005, OPER TECH ORTHOP, V15, P85, DOI 10.1053/j.oto.2005.01.001
  • [10] Distribution of in situ forces in the anterior cruciate ligament in response to rotatory loads
    Gabriel, MT
    Wong, EK
    Woo, SLY
    Yagi, M
    Debski, RE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 2004, 22 (01) : 85 - 89