Two-dimensional grey cloud clustering-fuzzy entropy comprehensive assessment model for river health evaluation

被引:22
作者
Yang, Zhe [1 ]
Yang, Kan [1 ]
Su, Lyuwen [1 ]
Hu, Hu [1 ]
机构
[1] Hohai Univ, Coll Hydrol & Water Resources, Nanjing 210098, Peoples R China
来源
HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT | 2020年 / 26卷 / 03期
关键词
river health evaluation; cloud model theory; fuzzy entropy; gray cloud whitened weight function; renewed combined weighting method; ALGORITHM; INDEX;
D O I
10.1080/10807039.2018.1536519
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
The river health evaluation is typically complex non-linear system with characteristics of fuzziness and randomness. However, conventional gray clustering method has difficult to effectively describe fuzzy and random information simultaneously. For this purpose, the cloud model and fuzzy entropy theory are introduced to establish 2D gray cloud clustering-fuzzy entropy comprehensive evaluation model. Different with health level models, it reflects river health situation from aspects of health level and corresponding water body complexity simultaneously. The health level is obtained by gray cloud whitened weight function (first sub-system) and fuzzy entropy represents complexity and fuzziness of river health situation (second sub-system). Moreover, multi-level river health evaluation indicator system is constructed with dividing indicators into common and distinct sections according to differences on river characteristics. Meanwhile, indicator weights are determined by renewed combined weighting method based on minimum deviation principle. Finally, we conduct health evaluation work for rivers in the Taihu basin. The evaluation health levels and fuzzy entropy for river A-G are H3 (0.4888, relatively significant); H2 (0.5476, relatively fuzzy); H2 (0.7526, fuzzy); H2 (0.4731, relatively significant); H2 (05138, relatively fuzzy); H3 (0.5822, relatively fuzzy), and H2 (0.4064, relatively significant), respectively. Results are consistent with current river health situation and more intuitive than compared models. Furthermore, evaluation results with four different weighting methods are compared to further demonstrate rationality of the weighting method and evaluation model. Hence, the model proposed is demonstrated to provide new insight for solving river health assessment problem effectively.
引用
收藏
页码:726 / 756
页数:31
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], ASSESSMENT RES MAJIA
[2]   INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY-SETS [J].
ATANASSOV, KT .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1986, 20 (01) :87-96
[3]  
Bain MarkB., 2000, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V3, P89, DOI [DOI 10.1016/S1462-9011(00)00029-0, 10.1016/S1462-9011(00)00029-0]
[4]  
Chessman BC, 2002, ASSESSING CONSERVATI
[5]  
Deng JL, 1986, BASIC METHODS GREY S, P69
[6]  
[邓晓军 Deng Xiaojun], 2014, [生态学报, Acta Ecologica Sinica], V34, P993
[7]  
[董奋义 Dong Fenyi], 2010, [农业系统科学与综合研究, System Sciences and Comprehensive Studies in Agriculture], V26, P478
[8]   State of environment indicators of 'river health': exploring the metaphor [J].
Fairweather, PG .
FRESHWATER BIOLOGY, 1999, 41 (02) :211-220
[9]  
[黄国如 Huang Guoru], 2014, [系统工程理论与实践, Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice], V34, P1345
[10]  
Huang Huawen, 2015, Railway Computer Application, V24, P62