Environmental Regulation Intensity, Carbon Footprint and Green Total Factor Productivity of Manufacturing Industries

被引:18
作者
Wang, Lei [1 ]
Yan, Yu [1 ]
机构
[1] Wuhan Univ, Cent China Dev Inst, Dept Reg Econ, Wuhan 430072, Peoples R China
关键词
SBM-MALMQUIST model; environmental regulations; direct carbon footprint;
D O I
10.3390/ijerph19010553
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In terms of the development of the manufacturing industry, the Chinese government has carried out environmental regulations and set up production standards for related industries. This is an environmentally-friendly and economic action, which is also in line with the requirements of building a green economy for China. Meanwhile, whether from the micro regulatory measures or the macro government policies, carbon emission is an inevitable problem in the study of environmental problems. This paper will explore the impact of environmental regulation on the green economy based on carbon emissions and study the optimal environment regulation intensity that relates to a direct carbon footprint under the maximum green economic benefits. A SBM-MALMQUIST model is established to measure the green total factor productivity according to 27 Chinese manufacturing industries through the MAXDEA software. It is found that the intensity of environmental regulation has a significant impact on green total factor productivity, and direct carbon footprint also exhibits a partial intermediary effect, participating in the mechanism that affects green total factor productivity. Combined with the industrial characteristics and the above research results, this paper puts forward the adjustment strategy of reasonable environmental regulation for the manufacturing industry, which conforms to the national policy guidance, and will be beneficial in promoting the economic development of the green manufacturing industry.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Journal of Management World, DOI DOI 10.19744/J.CNKI.11-1235/F.2010.10.008
[2]   Is free trade good for the environment? [J].
Antweiler, W ;
Copeland, BR ;
Taylor, MS .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2001, 91 (04) :877-908
[3]   How does environmental regulation affect production location of non-carbon ecological footprint? [J].
Asici, Ahmet Atil ;
Acar, Sevil .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 178 :927-936
[4]   Environmental regulation and productivity: Evidence from oil refineries [J].
Berman, E ;
Bui, LTM .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2001, 83 (03) :498-510
[5]  
Bing W., 2008, EC RES J, V5, P19
[6]   Creative accounting or creative destruction? Firm-level productivity growth in Chinese manufacturing [J].
Brandt, Loren ;
Van Biesebroeck, Johannes ;
Zhang, Yifan .
JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2012, 97 (02) :339-351
[7]  
Campbell Neil., 2003, International Journal of Business and Economics, V2, P129
[8]   Benefit and distance functions [J].
Chambers, RG ;
Chung, YH ;
Fare, R .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC THEORY, 1996, 70 (02) :407-419
[9]  
Chen S.., 2010, RSEARCH ENERGY CONSE
[10]   Determining the trade-environment composition effect: the role of capital, labor and environmental regulations [J].
Cole, MA ;
Elliott, RJR .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2003, 46 (03) :363-383