Effectiveness of hearing protector devices in impulse noise verified with transiently evoked and distortion product otoacoustic emissions

被引:13
作者
Bockstael, Annelies [1 ]
Keppler, Hannah [1 ]
Dhooge, Ingeborg [1 ]
D'haenens, Wendy [1 ]
Maes, Leen [1 ]
Philips, Birgit [1 ]
Vinck, Bart [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ghent, Fac Med, ENT Dept, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
关键词
hearing protectors; Impulse noise; military practice; transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions; distortion product otoacoustic emissions;
D O I
10.1080/14992020701704784
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
This study aimed to evaluate the effect of impulse noise on otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) while a passive non-linear earplug or an active level-dependent earmuff was worn. Since none of the standardized attenuation measurement techniques, REAT (real ear at threshold), ATF (acoustic test fixture), or MIRE (microphone in real ear), is designed to test both types in real-wearing condition, OAEs, suitable for detecting subtle changes in the functional integrity of the cochlear outer hair cells, are used. First, DPOAEs (distortion product) and TEOAEs (transiently evoked) of 24 subjects were compared before, immediately after gunfire practice, and after one hour of non-exposure. Secondly, both types of OAEs were evaluated in 31 subjects before and after exposure during a five-day military practice. Significant differences existed between the ears in most cases; the emissions from the right ear had a tendency to be more robust. There were no significant changes in OAEs either before and after exposure, or in the second experiment over multiple days. These findings suggest that the HPDs are able to prevent cochlear damage.
引用
收藏
页码:119 / 133
页数:15
相关论文
共 94 条
[1]   The effects of reverberant blast waves on the auditory system [J].
Ahroon, WA ;
Hamernik, RP ;
Lei, SF .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1996, 100 (04) :2247-2257
[2]  
*AM NAT STAND I, 1997, AM NAT STAND METH ME
[3]   Evaluating noise induced hearing loss with distortion product otoacoustic emissions [J].
Attias, J ;
Bresloff, I ;
Reshef, I ;
Horowitz, G ;
Furman, V .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 1998, 32 (01) :39-46
[4]  
Attias Joseph, 2001, Noise Health, V3, P19
[5]   Physiopathological significance of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions at 2f1-f2 produced by high-versus low-level stimuli [J].
Avan, P ;
Bonfils, P ;
Gilain, L ;
Mom, T .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2003, 113 (01) :430-441
[6]   The effect of impulse noise on distortion product otoacoustic emissions [J].
Balatsouras, DG ;
Tsimpiris, N ;
Korres, S ;
Karapantzos, F ;
Papadimitriou, N ;
Danielidis, V .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2005, 44 (09) :540-549
[8]   Hearing protection: Surpassing the limits to attenuation imposed by the bone-conduction pathways [J].
Berger, EH ;
Kieper, RW ;
Gauger, D .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2003, 114 (04) :1955-1967
[9]   INFLUENCE OF PHYSIOLOGICAL NOISE AND THE OCCLUSION EFFECT ON THE MEASUREMENT OF REAL-EAR ATTENUATION AT THRESHOLD [J].
BERGER, EH ;
KERIVAN, JE .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1983, 74 (01) :81-94
[10]   Development of a new standard laboratory protocol for estimating the field attenuation of hearing protection devices. Part III. The validity of using subject-fit data [J].
Berger, EH ;
Franks, JR ;
Behar, A ;
Casali, JG ;
Dixon-Ernst, C ;
Kieper, RW ;
Merry, CJ ;
Mozo, BT ;
Nixon, CW ;
Ohlin, D ;
Royster, JD ;
Royster, LH .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1998, 103 (02) :665-672