Model checking discounted temporal properties

被引:57
作者
de Alfaro, L [1 ]
Faella, M
Henzinger, TA
Majumdar, R
Stoelinga, M
机构
[1] Univ Calif Santa Cruz, CE, Santa Cruz, CA 95064 USA
[2] Univ Calif Berkeley, EECS, Berkeley, CA USA
[3] Ecole Polytech Fed Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
[4] Univ Calif Los Angeles, CS, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[5] Univ Twente, EWI, Enschede, Netherlands
关键词
logic; model checking; quantitative systems; discounting; CTL;
D O I
10.1016/j.tcs.2005.07.033
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
Temporal logic is two-valued: formulas are interpreted as either true or false. When applied to the analysis of stochastic systems, or systems with imprecise formal models, temporal logic is therefore fragile: even small changes in the model can lead to opposite truth values for a specification. We present a generalization of the branching-time logic CTL which achieves robustness with respect to model perturbations by giving a quantitative interpretation to predicates and logical operators, and by discounting the importance of events according to how late they occur. In every state, the value of a formula is a real number in the interval [0,1], where I corresponds to truth and 0 to falsehood. The boolean operators and and or are replaced by min and max, the path quantifiers 3 and V determine sup and inf over all paths from a given state, and the temporal operators rectangle and rectangle specify sup and inf over a given path; a new operator averages all values along a path. Furthermore, all path operators are discounted by a parameter that can be chosen to give more weight to states that are closer to the beginning of the path. We interpret the resulting logic DCTL over transition systems, Markov chains, and Markov decision processes. We present two semantics for DCTL: a path semantics, inspired by the standard interpretation of state and path formulas in CTL, and a fixpoint semantics, inspired by the mu-calculus evaluation of CTL formulas. We show that, while these semantics coincide for CTL, they differ for DCTL, and we provide model-checking algorithms for both semantics. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:139 / 170
页数:32
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Model Checking Temporal Properties of Recursive Probabilistic Programs
    Winkler, Tobias
    Gehnen, Christina
    Katoen, Joost-Pieter
    FOUNDATIONS OF SOFTWARE SCIENCE AND COMPUTATION STRUCTURES (FOSSACS 2022), 2022, 13242 : 449 - 469
  • [2] Model checking temporal properties of reaction systems
    Meski, Artur
    Penczek, Wojciech
    Rozenberg, Grzegorz
    INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2015, 313 : 22 - 42
  • [3] TAGED Approximations for Temporal Properties Model-Checking
    Courbis, Romeo
    Heam, Pierre-Cyrille
    Kouchnarenko, Olga
    IMPLEMENTATION AND APPLICATION OF AUTOMATA, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, 5642 : 135 - 144
  • [4] MODEL CHECKING TEMPORAL PROPERTIES OF RECURSIVE PROBABILISTIC PROGRAMS
    Winkler, Tobias
    Gehnen, Christina
    Katoen, Joost-Pieter
    LOGICAL METHODS IN COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2023, 19 (04)
  • [5] Model checking for real-time temporal, cooperation and epistemic properties
    Cao, Zining
    Intelligent Information Processing III, 2006, 228 : 63 - 72
  • [6] Model-checking the preservation of temporal properties upon feature integration
    Guelev D.P.
    Ryan M.D.
    Schobbens P.Y.
    International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer, 2007, 9 (1) : 53 - 62
  • [7] Temporal logic query checking: A tool for model exploration
    Gurfinkel, A
    Chechik, M
    Devereux, B
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, 2003, 29 (10) : 898 - 914
  • [8] Checking security properties by model checking
    De Francesco, N
    Lettieri, G
    SOFTWARE TESTING VERIFICATION & RELIABILITY, 2003, 13 (03) : 181 - 196
  • [9] Model-checking the Preservation of Temporal Properties upon Feature Integration
    Guelev, Dimitar P.
    Ryan, Mark
    Schobbens, Pierre Yves
    ELECTRONIC NOTES IN THEORETICAL COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2005, 128 (06) : 311 - 324
  • [10] Model checking distributed temporal logic
    Dionisio, Francisco
    Ramos, Jaime
    Subtil, Fernando
    Vigano, Luca
    LOGIC JOURNAL OF THE IGPL, 2024,