Endoscopic Full Thickness Resection: A Systematic Review

被引:1
作者
Pal, Partha [1 ]
Ramchandani, Mohan [1 ]
Inavolu, Pradev [1 ]
Reddy, Duvvuru Nageshwar [1 ]
Tandan, Manu [1 ]
机构
[1] Asian Inst Gastroenterol, Dept Intervent Endoscopy, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
关键词
endoscopic full thickness resection; full thickness resection device; sub-epithelial lesions; over the scope dips; THE-SCOPE CLIP; GASTRIC SUBEPITHELIAL TUMORS; GASTROINTESTINAL STROMAL TUMOR; PUNCTURE-SUTURE DEVICE; MUSCULARIS PROPRIA; DEFECT CLOSURE; INCOMPLETE RESECTION; SUBMUCOSAL TUMORS; NEUROENDOCRINE TUMOR; APPENDICEAL ORIFICE;
D O I
10.1055/s-0042-1755304
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Endoscopic full thickness resection (EFTR) is an emerging therapeutic option for resecting subepithelial lesions (SELs) and epithelial neoplasms. We aimed to systematically review the techniques, applications, outcomes, and complications of EFIR. Methods A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed. All relevant original research articles involving EFTR were included for the review along with case report/series describing novel/rare techniques from 2001 to February 2022. Results After screening 7,739 citations, finally 141 references were included. Non-exposed EFTR has lower probability of peritoneal contamination or tumor seeding compared with exposed EFTR. Among exposed EFTR, tunneled variety is associated with lower risk of peritoneal seeding or contamination compared with non-tunneled approach. Closure techniques involve though the scope (ITS) dips, loop and dips, over the scope dips (OTSC), full thickness resection device (FTRD), and endoscopic suturing/plicating/stapling devices. The indications of EFTR range from esophagus to rectum and include SELs arising from muscularis propria (MP), non-lifting adenoma, recurrent adenoma, and even early gastric cancer (EGC) or superficial colorectal carcinoma. Other indications include difficult locations (involving appendicular orifice or diverticulum) and full thickness biopsy for motility disorders. The main limitation of FTRD is feasibility in smaller lesions (<20-25 mm), which can be circumvented by hybrid EFTR techniques. Oncologic resection with lymphadencetomy for superficial GI malignancy can be accomplished by hybrid natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) combining EFTR and NOTES. Bleeding, perforation, appendicitis, enterocolonic fistula, FTRD malfunction, peritoneal tumor seeding, and contamination are among various adverse events. Post OTSC artifacts need to be differentiated from recurrent/residual lesions to avoid re-FTRD/surgery. Conclusion EFTR is safe and effective therapeutic option for SELs, recurrent and non-lifting adenomas, tumors in difficult locations and selected cases of superficial GI carcinoma.
引用
收藏
页码:152 / 169
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Endoscopic full-thickness resection for a gastric angioleiomyoma
    Liu, Guinan
    Tan, Yuyong
    Huo, Jirong
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ENFERMEDADES DIGESTIVAS, 2017, 109 (08) : 604 - U151
  • [42] Endoscopic full thickness resection: A surgeon's perspective
    Schrope, Beth A.
    Charak, Gregory
    TECHNIQUES IN GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2019, 21 (01) : 2 - 6
  • [43] Endoscopic resection for subepithelial lesions-pure endoscopic full-thickness resection and submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection
    Zhang, Xiaocen
    Modayil, Rani
    Criscitelli, Theresa
    Stavropoulos, Stavros N.
    TRANSLATIONAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2019, 4
  • [44] Comparison of two methods for endoscopic full-thickness resection of gastrointestinal lesions using OTSC
    Wang, Wenhai
    Li, Peng
    Ji, Ming
    Wang, Yongjun
    Zhu, Shengtao
    Liu, Lihua
    Zhang, Shutian
    MINIMALLY INVASIVE THERAPY & ALLIED TECHNOLOGIES, 2019, : 268 - 276
  • [45] Endoscopic full-thickness resection using an over-the-scope device: A prospective study
    Guo, Jin-Tao
    Zhang, Jing-Ding
    Wu, Yu-Fan
    Liao, Ye
    Wang, Yi-Dan
    Zhang, Bao-Zhen
    Wang, Sheng
    Sun, Si-Yu
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2021, 27 (08) : 725 - 736
  • [46] Comparison between submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection and endoscopic full-thickness resection for gastric stromal tumors originating from the muscularis propria layer
    Tan, Yuyong
    Tang, Xiaoyu
    Guo, Ting
    Peng, Dongzi
    Tang, Yao
    Duan, Tianying
    Wang, Xuehong
    Lv, Liang
    Huo, Jirong
    Liu, Deliang
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2017, 31 (08): : 3376 - 3382
  • [47] Subepithelial tumors in the upper gastrointestinal tract Endoscopic tunnel resection, endoscopic full-thickness resection or only surveillance?
    Meier, Benjamin
    Caca, Karel
    GASTROENTEROLOGE, 2022, 17 (02): : 103 - 108
  • [48] Endoscopic Full-thickness Resection for Gastric Subepithelial Tumors Originating From the Muscularis Propria: A 69-Case Series
    Sun, Meiling
    Song, Jitao
    Song, Xinuan
    Liu, Bingrong
    SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2018, 28 (01) : E12 - E17
  • [49] Endoscopic full-thickness resection of colorectal lesions with the full-thickness resection device: clinical experience from two referral centers in Greece
    Velegraki, Magdalini
    Trikola, Artemis
    Vasiliadis, Konstantinos
    Fragaki, Maria
    Mpitouli, Afroditi
    Dimas, Ioannis
    Voudoukis, Evangelos
    Giannikaki, Elpida
    Kapranou, Amalia
    Kordelas, Athanasios
    Stefanidis, Gerasimos
    Paspatis, Gregorios A.
    ANNALS OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2019, 32 (05): : 482 - 488
  • [50] Factors associated with endoscopic full-thickness resection of gastric submucosal tumors
    Yang, Fei
    Wang, Sheng
    Sun, Siyu
    Liu, Xiang
    Ge, Nan
    Wang, Guoxin
    Guo, Jintao
    Liu, Wen
    Feng, Linlin
    Ma, Wenzhuang
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2015, 29 (12): : 3588 - 3593