Endoscopic Full Thickness Resection: A Systematic Review

被引:1
|
作者
Pal, Partha [1 ]
Ramchandani, Mohan [1 ]
Inavolu, Pradev [1 ]
Reddy, Duvvuru Nageshwar [1 ]
Tandan, Manu [1 ]
机构
[1] Asian Inst Gastroenterol, Dept Intervent Endoscopy, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
关键词
endoscopic full thickness resection; full thickness resection device; sub-epithelial lesions; over the scope dips; THE-SCOPE CLIP; GASTRIC SUBEPITHELIAL TUMORS; GASTROINTESTINAL STROMAL TUMOR; PUNCTURE-SUTURE DEVICE; MUSCULARIS PROPRIA; DEFECT CLOSURE; INCOMPLETE RESECTION; SUBMUCOSAL TUMORS; NEUROENDOCRINE TUMOR; APPENDICEAL ORIFICE;
D O I
10.1055/s-0042-1755304
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Endoscopic full thickness resection (EFTR) is an emerging therapeutic option for resecting subepithelial lesions (SELs) and epithelial neoplasms. We aimed to systematically review the techniques, applications, outcomes, and complications of EFIR. Methods A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed. All relevant original research articles involving EFTR were included for the review along with case report/series describing novel/rare techniques from 2001 to February 2022. Results After screening 7,739 citations, finally 141 references were included. Non-exposed EFTR has lower probability of peritoneal contamination or tumor seeding compared with exposed EFTR. Among exposed EFTR, tunneled variety is associated with lower risk of peritoneal seeding or contamination compared with non-tunneled approach. Closure techniques involve though the scope (ITS) dips, loop and dips, over the scope dips (OTSC), full thickness resection device (FTRD), and endoscopic suturing/plicating/stapling devices. The indications of EFTR range from esophagus to rectum and include SELs arising from muscularis propria (MP), non-lifting adenoma, recurrent adenoma, and even early gastric cancer (EGC) or superficial colorectal carcinoma. Other indications include difficult locations (involving appendicular orifice or diverticulum) and full thickness biopsy for motility disorders. The main limitation of FTRD is feasibility in smaller lesions (<20-25 mm), which can be circumvented by hybrid EFTR techniques. Oncologic resection with lymphadencetomy for superficial GI malignancy can be accomplished by hybrid natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) combining EFTR and NOTES. Bleeding, perforation, appendicitis, enterocolonic fistula, FTRD malfunction, peritoneal tumor seeding, and contamination are among various adverse events. Post OTSC artifacts need to be differentiated from recurrent/residual lesions to avoid re-FTRD/surgery. Conclusion EFTR is safe and effective therapeutic option for SELs, recurrent and non-lifting adenomas, tumors in difficult locations and selected cases of superficial GI carcinoma.
引用
收藏
页码:152 / 169
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Endoscopic Full Thickness Resection
    Rajan, Elizabeth
    Song, Louis M. Wong Kee
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2018, 154 (07) : 1925 - +
  • [2] Endoscopic full-thickness resection
    Meier, B.
    Schmidt, A.
    Caca, K.
    INTERNIST, 2016, 57 (08): : 755 - 762
  • [3] Endoscopic full-thickness resection
    Friedel, David
    Zhang, Xiaocen
    Modayil, Rani
    Stavropoulos, Stavros N.
    TECHNIQUES IN GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2019, 21 (01) : 19 - 25
  • [4] Endoscopic full-thickness resection: current status
    Schmidt, Arthur
    Meier, Benjamin
    Caca, Karel
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2015, 21 (31) : 9273 - 9285
  • [5] Endoscopic full thickness resection versus submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection for removal of submucosal tumors: a review article
    Dellatore, Peter
    Bhagat, Vicky
    Kahaleh, Michel
    TRANSLATIONAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2019, 4
  • [6] Recent advances and current challenges in endoscopic resection with the full-thickness resection device
    Mun, Elijah J.
    Wagh, Mihir S.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2023, 29 (25) : 4009 - 4020
  • [7] Efficacy and Safety of Full-thickness Resection Device (FTRD) for Colorectal Lesions Endoscopic Full-thickness Resection A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Fahmawi, Yazan
    Hanjar, Abrahim
    Ahmed, Yasir
    Abdalhadi, Haneen
    Mulekar, Madhuri S.
    Merritt, Lindsey
    Kumar, Manoj
    Mizrahi, Meir
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2021, 55 (04) : E27 - E36
  • [8] Current Status of Exposed Endoscopic Full-Thickness Resection and Further Development of Non-Exposed Endoscopic Full-Thickness Resection
    Mori, Hirohito
    Rahman, Asadur
    Kobara, Hideki
    Fujihara, Shintaro
    Nishiyama, Noriko
    Ayaki, Maki
    Matsunaga, Tae
    Murakami, Masanori
    Masaki, Tsumomu
    DIGESTION, 2017, 95 (01) : 6 - 15
  • [9] Endoscopic full-thickness resection, indication, methods and perspectives
    Wang, Kehao
    Gao, Pingting
    Cai, Mingyan
    Song, Baohui
    Zhou, Pinghong
    DIGESTIVE ENDOSCOPY, 2023, 35 (02) : 195 - 205
  • [10] Pathology perspective on endoscopic full thickness resection
    Fazlollahi, Ladan
    Remotti, Helen E.
    TECHNIQUES IN GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2019, 21 (01) : 7 - 12