Comparing the Functioning of Youth and Adult Partnerships for Health Promotion

被引:11
作者
Brown, Louis D. [1 ]
Redelfs, Alisha H. [1 ]
Taylor, Thomas J. [2 ]
Messer, Reanna L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr Houston, Sch Publ Hlth, El Paso, TX 79902 USA
[2] Vet Affairs Palo Alto Hlth Care Syst, Palo Alto, CA USA
关键词
Youth-adult partnerships; Smoking; Empowerment; Coalition functioning; Adolescent; Comparative study; COMMUNITY PREVENTION COALITIONS; PROBLEM BEHAVIORS; NORTH-CAROLINA; HIV PREVENTION; CARE MODEL; PROGRAMS; PARTICIPATION; RISK; EMPOWERMENT; CAPACITY;
D O I
10.1007/s10464-015-9730-2
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Youth partnerships are a promising but understudied strategy for prevention and health promotion. Specifically, little is known about how the functioning of youth partnerships differs from that of adult partnerships. Accordingly, this study compared the functioning of youth partnerships with that of adult partnerships. Several aspects of partnership functioning, including leadership, task focus, cohesion, participation costs and benefits, and community support, were examined. Standardized partnership functioning surveys were administered to participants in three smoke-free youth coalitions (n = 44; 45 % female; 43 % non-Hispanic white; mean age = 13) and in 53 Communities That Care adult coalitions (n = 673; 69 % female; 88 % non-Hispanic white; mean age = 49). Multilevel regression analyses showed that most aspects of partnership functioning did not differ significantly between youth and adult partnerships. These findings are encouraging given the success of the adult partnerships in reducing community-level rates of substance use and delinquency. Although youth partnership functioning appears to be strong enough to support effective prevention strategies, youth partnerships faced substantially more participation difficulties than adult partnerships. Strategies that youth partnerships can use to manage these challenges, such as creative scheduling and increasing opportunities for youth to help others directly, are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 35
页数:11
相关论文
共 54 条
[41]   CHARACTERISTICS AND PARTICIPANT PERCEPTIONS OF TOBACCO CONTROL COALITIONS IN CALIFORNIA [J].
ROGERS, T ;
HOWARDPITNEY, B ;
FEIGHERY, EC ;
ALTMAN, DG ;
ENDRES, JM ;
ROESELER, AG .
HEALTH EDUCATION RESEARCH, 1993, 8 (03) :345-357
[42]   A review of collaborative partnerships as a strategy for improving community health [J].
Roussos, ST ;
Fawcett, SB .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2000, 21 :369-402
[43]  
Sofaer S., 2004, WORKING TOGETHER MOV
[44]   Using the Give-Get Grid to Understand Potential Expectations of Engagement in a Community-Academic Partnership [J].
Southerland, Jodi ;
Behringer, Bruce ;
Slawson, Deborah L. .
HEALTH PROMOTION PRACTICE, 2013, 14 (06) :909-917
[45]   Designing the Process Evaluation for the Collaborative Planning of a Local Turning Point Partnership [J].
Tolma, Eleni L. ;
Cheney, Marshall K. ;
Troup, Pam ;
Hann, Neil .
HEALTH PROMOTION PRACTICE, 2009, 10 (04) :537-548
[46]   Peer acceleration: effects of a social network tailored substance abuse prevention program among high-risk adolescents [J].
Valente, Thomas W. ;
Ritt-Olson, Anamara ;
Stacy, Alan ;
Unger, Jennifer B. ;
Okamoto, Janet ;
Sussman, Steve .
ADDICTION, 2007, 102 (11) :1804-1815
[47]   What motivates people to participate more in community-based coalitions? [J].
Wells, Rebecca ;
Ward, Ann J. ;
Feinberg, Mark ;
Alexander, Jeffrey A. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 42 (1-2) :94-104
[48]   Factors Affecting Member Perceptions of Coalition Impact [J].
Wells, Rebecca ;
Feinberg, Mark ;
Alexander, Jeffrey A. ;
Ward, Ann J. .
NONPROFIT MANAGEMENT & LEADERSHIP, 2009, 19 (03) :327-348
[49]  
Wernick L.J., 2010, Case studies in community-based participatory research, P165
[50]   A Typology of Youth Participation and Empowerment for Child and Adolescent Health Promotion [J].
Wong, Naima T. ;
Zimmerman, Marc A. ;
Parker, Edith A. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 46 (1-2) :100-114