Summer drought survival and recovery in Microlaena stipoides

被引:4
|
作者
Mitchell, M. L. [1 ,5 ]
Virgona, J. M. [2 ]
Jacobs, J. L. [3 ]
Kemp, D. R. [4 ]
机构
[1] Rutherglen Ctr, DEDJTR, 124 Chiltern Valley Rd, Rutherglen, Vic 3685, Australia
[2] Graminus Consulting PL, 1 Heron Pl, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2768, Australia
[3] Ellinbank Ctr, DEDJTR, 1301 Hazeldean Rd, Ellinbank, Vic 3280, Australia
[4] Charles Sturt Univ, Sch Agr & Wine Sci, POB 883, Orange, NSW 2800, Australia
[5] Univ Western Australia M081, Future Farm Ind CRC, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
关键词
native grass; rainout shelters; relative water content; weeping grass; SOUTH-EASTERN AUSTRALIA; INDIGENOUS PERENNIAL GRASSES; DRYLAND SALINITY MANAGEMENT; SIMULATED MIDSUMMER STORM; 2 CONTRASTING CULTIVARS; DACTYLIS-GLOMERATA L; PHALARIS-AQUATICA L; LOW-INPUT PASTURES; GRAZING MANAGEMENT; MEDITERRANEAN GRASSES;
D O I
10.1071/RJ16005
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Microlaena stipoides (microlaena) is an important perennial grass in over 7million hectares of native pastures in southern Australia and can survive and persist despite severe soil water deficits during summer. Many other pasture species survive similar conditions by relying on summer dormancy, which raises the possibility that microlaena may behave similarly. A field experiment using rainout shelters was conducted on an existing microlaena pasture in north-east Victoria. The experiment was a split-plot design with two watering treatments ('summer storm' or 'summer dry') as main plots and three defoliation treatments (nil, intense defoliation, strategic defoliation) as subplots. The 'summer storm' treatment resulted in the formation of new buds and tillers and increased basal cover from 1% in February to 18% in March. A glasshouse pot experiment examined the recovery of microlaena after different periods of drought and subsequent rewatering. In the pot experiment, microlaena withstood relatively short (up to 30 days) dry periods and then recovered when rewatered. Thus, it appears that microlaena is a persistent, perennial pasture plant that, although it survives very dry summers in Mediterranean areas, is not summer dormant. Microlaena does not exhibit summer dormancy in response to moisture stress and enter a quiescent stage, because normal growth is prevented by the lack of water, but it quickly recommences growth when soil water becomes available. The ability of microlaena to withstand summer soil water deficits and to recruit from seedlings make it a valuable pasture species across drought-prone environments, and this undoubtedly partly explains its very broad adaptation across eastern Australia.
引用
收藏
页码:501 / 510
页数:10
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [11] Evaluating the potential drought tolerance of pansy through its physiological and biochemical responses to drought and recovery periods
    Oraee, Atiyeh
    Tehranifar, Ali
    SCIENTIA HORTICULTURAE, 2020, 265
  • [12] Occurrence of repeated drought events: can repetitive stress situations and recovery from drought be traced with leaf reflectance?
    Linke, Rita
    Richter, Katja
    Haumann, Judith
    Schneider, Werner
    Weihs, Philipp
    PERIODICUM BIOLOGORUM, 2008, 110 (03) : 219 - 229
  • [13] Insights into the Drought and Heat Avoidance Mechanism in Summer-Dormant Mediterranean Tall Fescue
    Missaoui, Ali M.
    Malinowski, Dariusz P.
    Pinchak, William E.
    Kigel, Jaime
    FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2017, 8
  • [14] Methyl Jasmonate Mitigates Drought Stress Injuries and Affects Essential Oil of Summer Savory
    Miranshahi, B.
    Sayyari, M.
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 18 (06): : 1635 - 1645
  • [15] Measuring dehydration tolerance in pasture grasses to improve drought survival
    Norton, M. R.
    Lelievre, F.
    Volaire, F.
    CROP & PASTURE SCIENCE, 2014, 65 (08) : 828 - 840
  • [16] Stress Reactions of Maize Genotypes to Drought Stress at Different Phenophases and Recovery
    Sarkar, B.
    Savita, S. K.
    Varalaxmi, Y.
    Vanaja, M.
    Kumar, N. Ravi
    Sathish, P.
    Lakshmi, N. Jyothi
    Prabhakar, M.
    Shanker, A. K.
    Yadav, S. K.
    Maheswari, M.
    RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 2022, 69 (03)
  • [17] Stress Reactions of Maize Genotypes to Drought Stress at Different Phenophases and Recovery
    B. Sarkar
    S. K. Savita
    Y. Varalaxmi
    M. Vanaja
    N. Ravi Kumar
    P. Sathish
    N. Jyothi Lakshmi
    M. Prabhakar
    A. K. Shanker
    S. K. Yadav
    M. Maheswari
    Russian Journal of Plant Physiology, 2022, 69
  • [18] Observations on tillering in cultivars of Phalaris under rotational grazing in a year with a Summer-Autumn drought
    Culvenor, RA
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 1997, 48 (04): : 467 - 476
  • [19] Water use efficiency and drought survival in Mediterranean perennial forage grasses
    Lelievre, F.
    Seddaiu, G.
    Ledda, L.
    Porqueddu, C.
    Volaire, F.
    FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2011, 121 (03) : 333 - 342
  • [20] Morphological and physiological changes in Artemisia selengensis under drought and after rehydration recovery
    Huang, Hui-Xiong
    Cao, Yun
    Xin, Kai-Jing
    Liang, Rong-Hua
    Chen, Yi-Ting
    Qi, Jia-Jun
    FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2022, 13