Reasons US women have abortions: Quantitative and qualitative perspectives

被引:282
作者
Finer, LB [1 ]
Frohwirth, LF [1 ]
Dauphinee, LA [1 ]
Singh, S [1 ]
Moore, AM [1 ]
机构
[1] Alan Guttmacher Inst, New York, NY 10005 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1363/3711005
中图分类号
C921 [人口统计学];
学科分类号
摘要
CONTEXT: Understanding women's reasons for having abortions can inform public debate and policy regarding abortion and unwanted pregnancy. Demographic changes over the last two decades highlight the need for a reassessment of why women decide to have abortions. METHODS: In 2004, a structured survey was completed by 1,209 abortion patients at 11 large providers, and in-depth interviews were conducted with 38 women at four sites. Bivariate analyses examined differences in the reasons for abortion across subgroups, and multivariate logistic regression models assessed associations between respondent characteristics and reported reasons. RESULTS: The reasons most frequently cited were that having a child would interfere with a woman's education, work or ability to care for dependents (74%); that she could not afford a baby now (73%); and that she did not want to be a single mother or was having relationship problems (48%). Nearly four in 10 women said they had completed their childbearing, and almost one-third were not ready to have a child. Fewer than 1% said their parents' or partners' desire for them to have an abortion was the most important reason. Younger women often reported that they were unprepared for the transition to motherhood, while older women regularly cited their responsibility to dependents. CONCLUSIONS: The decision to have an abortion is typically motivated by multiple, diverse and interrelated reasons. The themes of responsibility to others and resource limitations, such as financial constraints and lack of partner support recurred throughout the study.
引用
收藏
页码:110 / 118
页数:9
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
*AGI, 2005, EST US AB INC 2001 2
[2]   Reasons why women have induced abortions: Evidence from 27 countries [J].
Bankole, A ;
Singh, S ;
Haas, T .
INTERNATIONAL FAMILY PLANNING PERSPECTIVES, 1998, 24 (03) :117-+
[3]  
*ELL I, 2004, FORC AB AM SPEC REP
[4]  
ERNST M, 2005, KA LEO O HAWAII 0421
[5]   WOMEN AND ABORTION - ATTITUDES, SOCIAL NETWORKS, DECISION-MAKING [J].
FARIA, G ;
BARRETT, E ;
GOODMAN, LM .
SOCIAL WORK IN HEALTH CARE, 1985, 11 (01) :85-99
[6]   Social context and the experience of a sample of US women taking RU-486 (mifepristone) for early abortion [J].
Fielding, SL ;
Schaff, EA .
QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH, 2004, 14 (05) :612-627
[7]   Abortion incidence and services in the United States in 2000 [J].
Finer, LB ;
Henshaw, K .
PERSPECTIVES ON SEXUAL AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2003, 35 (01) :6-15
[8]   ABORTION - PREDICTING THE COMPLEXITY OF THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS [J].
FRIEDLANDER, ML ;
KAUL, TJ ;
STIMEL, CA .
WOMEN & HEALTH, 1984, 9 (01) :43-54
[9]  
Hansen S K, 1996, Ugeskr Laeger, V158, P5773
[10]   Abortion patients in 1994-1995: Characteristics and contraceptive use [J].
Henshaw, SK ;
Kost, K .
FAMILY PLANNING PERSPECTIVES, 1996, 28 (04) :140-&