Comparison and Combination of Single-Lead ECG and Photoplethysmography Algorithms for Wearable-Based Atrial Fibrillation Screening

被引:9
作者
Mutke, Markus R. [1 ,2 ]
Brasier, Noe [1 ,3 ]
Raichle, Christina [4 ]
Ravanelli, Flavia [1 ]
Doerr, Marcus [5 ,6 ]
Eckstein, Jens [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Basel, Chief Med Informat Officer Off, Basel, Switzerland
[2] Univ Hosp Basel, Dept Internal Med, Spitalstr 21, CH-4031 Basel, Switzerland
[3] Kantonsspital Obwalden, Dept Internal Med, Sarnen, Switzerland
[4] Kantonsspital Basel Land, Dept Gastroenterol, Internal Med, Liestal, Switzerland
[5] Univ Med Greifswald, German Ctr Cardiovasc Res, Partner Site Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
[6] Univ Med Greifswald, Dept Internal Med B, Greifswald, Germany
关键词
atrial fibrillation; eHealth; smartphone; photoplethysmography; iECG; wearables; FOLLOW-UP; PREVALENCE; RISK; PROGNOSIS; STROKE;
D O I
10.1089/tmj.2020.0036
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF), the most common cardiac arrhythmia, can be detected by smartphones and smartwatches. Introduction: Single-lead ECGs (iECGs) and photoplethysmography (PPG) sensors provide the opportunity for a broad, simple, and easily repeatable cardiac rhythm analysis. To reduce unnecessary medical follow-up testing due to false positive results, our aim was to find a screening approach applicable on smart devices with a focus on high specificity. Methods: We used PPG measurements from smartphones and smartwatches and iECG data from two previous validation trials. Two AF detection algorithms (A and B) were applied on the iECG dataset and compared directly. Further, we used 1-min PPG measurements as a first-pass filter for arrhythmia detection and simulated a sequential testing: Once an arrhythmia was detected in the PPG, the iECG counterpart of the patient was analyzed by algorithm A, B, or A + B combined although algorithm B was primarily designed for PPG analysis. Results: The iECGs from 1,288 participants were analyzed. Algorithm A did not show a diagnosis in 16.1%. In the remaining, sensitivity and specificity were 99.6%, and 97.4% respectively. Accuracy was 98.5%, and correct classification rate (CCR) was 82.7%. Algorithm B always differentiated between normal and arrhythmic and reached an overall sensitivity of 95.4%, a specificity of 91.6%, and an accuracy and CCR of 93.3%. Sequential testing by combining both algorithms into a three-phase test (Test positive PPG, then iECG analysis by A and B combined) resulted in a 100% specificity. Conclusion: Algorithm B performed strongly in PPG analysis as well as iECG analysis. PPG signals and consecutive iECG combined when an arrhythmia was detected by PPG resulted in a specificity that was higher than 99%. Discussion: The analysis allows a direct comparison of iECG algorithms without possible dilution by different measurement procedures or recording-devices. We improved specificity in AF-screening approaches with wearables by simulating a novel approach. Results rely on signal quality.
引用
收藏
页码:296 / 302
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   All-cause mortality in 272 186 patients hospitalized with incident atrial fibrillation 1995-2008: a Swedish nationwide long-term case-control study [J].
Andersson, Tommy ;
Magnuson, Anders ;
Bryngelsson, Ing-Liss ;
Frobert, Ole ;
Henriksson, Karin M. ;
Edvardsson, Nils ;
Poci, Dritan .
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2013, 34 (14) :1061-1067
[2]  
[Anonymous], SMARTW HAV MOR JUST
[3]   Cost-effectiveness of mass screening for untreated atrial fibrillation using intermittent ECG recording [J].
Aronsson, Mattias ;
Svennberg, Emma ;
Rosenqvist, Marten ;
Engdahl, Johan ;
Al-Khalili, Faris ;
Friberg, Leif ;
Frykman-Kull, Viveka ;
Levin, Lars-Ake .
EUROPACE, 2015, 17 (07) :1023-1029
[4]   Impact of atrial fibrillation on the risk of death [J].
Benjamin, EJ ;
Wolf, PA ;
D'Agostino, RB ;
Silbershatz, H ;
Kannel, WB ;
Levy, D .
CIRCULATION, 1998, 98 (10) :946-952
[5]   y Detection of atrial fibrillation with a smartphone camera: first prospective, international, two-centre, clinical validation study (DETECTAF PRO) [J].
Brasier, Noe ;
Raichle, Christina J. ;
Doerr, Marcus ;
Becke, Adrian ;
Nohturfft, Vivien ;
Weber, Stefan ;
Bulacher, Fabienne ;
Salomon, Lorena ;
Noah, Thierry ;
Birkemeyer, Ralf ;
Eckstein, Jens .
EUROPACE, 2019, 21 (01) :41-47
[6]   Estimates of Current and Future Incidence and Prevalence of Atrial Fibrillation in the US Adult Population [J].
Colilla, Susan ;
Crow, Ann ;
Petkun, William ;
Singer, Daniel E. ;
Simon, Teresa ;
Liu, Xianchen .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2013, 112 (08) :1142-1147
[7]  
Comstock J., 2018, MobiHealthNews
[8]   The WATCH AF Trial: SmartWATCHes for Detection of Atrial Fibrillation [J].
Doerr, Marcus ;
Nohturfft, Vivien ;
Brasier, Noe ;
Bosshard, Emil ;
Djurdjevic, Aleksandar ;
Gross, Stefan ;
Raichle, Christina J. ;
Rhinisperger, Mattias ;
Stoeckli, Raphael ;
Eckstein, Jens .
JACC-CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2019, 5 (02) :199-208
[9]   Assessment of Remote Heart Rhythm Sampling Using the AliveCor Heart Monitor to Screen for Atrial Fibrillation: The REHEARSE-AF Study [J].
Halcox, Julian P. J. ;
Wareham, Kathie ;
Cardew, Antonia ;
Gilmore, Mark ;
Barry, James P. ;
Phillips, Ceri ;
Gravenor, Michael B. .
CIRCULATION, 2017, 136 (19) :1784-1794
[10]   Prevalence, incidence and lifetime risk of atrial fibrillation: the Rotterdam study [J].
Heeringa, J ;
van der Kuip, DAM ;
Hofman, A ;
Kors, JA ;
van Herpen, G ;
Stricker, BHC ;
Stijnen, T ;
Lip, GYH ;
Witteman, JCM .
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2006, 27 (08) :949-953