Factors affecting employee performance: an empirical approach

被引:170
作者
Diamantidis, Anastasios D. [1 ]
Chatzoglou, Prodromos [1 ]
机构
[1] Democritus Univ Thrace, Dept Prod & Management Engn, Xanthi, Greece
关键词
Adaptability; Proactivity; Employee performance; HUMAN-RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE; JOB-PERFORMANCE; PROACTIVE BEHAVIOR; FIRM PERFORMANCE; WORK; PERCEPTIONS; FLEXIBILITY; PERSONALITY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1108/IJPPM-01-2018-0012
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Purpose Nowadays, the phenomenon of increased competition between firms and their need to respond effectively to rapidly changing operational conditions, as well as to personnel requirements, has escalated the necessity to identify those factors that affect employee performance (EP). The purpose of this paper is to examine the interrelations between firm/environment-related factors (training culture, management support, environmental dynamism and organizational climate), job-related factors (job environment, job autonomy, job communication) and employee-related factors (intrinsic motivation, skill flexibility, skill level, proactivity, adaptability, commitment) and their impact on EP. Design/methodology/approach A new research model that examines the relationships between these factors and EP is proposed utilizing the structural equation modeling approach. Findings The results indicate that job environment and management support have the strongest impacts (direct and indirect) on job performance, while adaptability and intrinsic motivation directly affect job performance. Research limitations/implications A potential limitation of this research is that it is not focused only on one business sector (i.e. the sample is heterogeneous). Originality/value In this study, firm/environmental-related factors, job-related factors, employee-related factors and EP are incorporated in a single model using data from small- and medium-sized enterprises. Overall, the final model can explain 27 percent of EP variance (first-level analysis) and 42 percent of EP variance (second-level analysis).
引用
收藏
页码:171 / 193
页数:23
相关论文
共 74 条
[11]   Parsing organizational culture: How the norm for adaptability influences the relationship between culture consensus and financial performance in high-technology firms [J].
Chatman, Jennifer A. ;
Caldwell, David F. ;
O'Reilly, Charles A. ;
Doerr, Bernadette .
JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2014, 35 (06) :785-808
[12]  
Chen J., 2006, LEADERSHIP ORG DEV J, V27, P242, DOI [DOI 10.1108/01437730610666000, 10.1108/01437730610666000]
[13]   The relationship between the three components of commitment and employee performance in China [J].
Chen, ZX ;
Francesco, AM .
JOURNAL OF VOCATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2003, 62 (03) :490-510
[14]   Proactive behavior in organizations [J].
Crant, JM .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2000, 26 (03) :435-462
[15]   The impact of human resource management practices on perceptions of organizational performance [J].
Delaney, JT ;
Huselid, MA .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1996, 39 (04) :949-969
[16]   The influence of training and training transfer factors on organisational learning and performance [J].
Dermol, Valerij ;
Cater, Tomaz .
PERSONNEL REVIEW, 2013, 42 (03) :324-348
[17]   Intrinsic motivation as a moderator on the relationship between perceived job autonomy and work performance [J].
Dysvik, Anders ;
Kuvaas, Bard .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF WORK AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 20 (03) :367-387
[18]   The impact of organizational culture on the relationship between shared leadership and team proactivity [J].
Erkutlu, Hakan .
TEAM PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT, 2012, 18 (1-2) :102-+
[19]   Spirituality and Organizational Culture: Cultivating the ABCs of an Inspiring Workplace [J].
Fawcett, Stanley E. ;
Brau, James C. ;
Rhoads, Gary K. ;
Whitlark, David ;
Fawcett, Amydee M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2008, 31 (04) :420-438
[20]   The dynamics of proactivity at work [J].
Grant, Adam M. ;
Ashford, Susan J. .
RESEARCH IN ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, VOL 28: AN ANNUAL SERIES OF ANALYTICAL ESSAYS AND CRITICAL REVIEWS, 2008, 28 :3-34