Factors affecting employee performance: an empirical approach

被引:170
作者
Diamantidis, Anastasios D. [1 ]
Chatzoglou, Prodromos [1 ]
机构
[1] Democritus Univ Thrace, Dept Prod & Management Engn, Xanthi, Greece
关键词
Adaptability; Proactivity; Employee performance; HUMAN-RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE; JOB-PERFORMANCE; PROACTIVE BEHAVIOR; FIRM PERFORMANCE; WORK; PERCEPTIONS; FLEXIBILITY; PERSONALITY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1108/IJPPM-01-2018-0012
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Purpose Nowadays, the phenomenon of increased competition between firms and their need to respond effectively to rapidly changing operational conditions, as well as to personnel requirements, has escalated the necessity to identify those factors that affect employee performance (EP). The purpose of this paper is to examine the interrelations between firm/environment-related factors (training culture, management support, environmental dynamism and organizational climate), job-related factors (job environment, job autonomy, job communication) and employee-related factors (intrinsic motivation, skill flexibility, skill level, proactivity, adaptability, commitment) and their impact on EP. Design/methodology/approach A new research model that examines the relationships between these factors and EP is proposed utilizing the structural equation modeling approach. Findings The results indicate that job environment and management support have the strongest impacts (direct and indirect) on job performance, while adaptability and intrinsic motivation directly affect job performance. Research limitations/implications A potential limitation of this research is that it is not focused only on one business sector (i.e. the sample is heterogeneous). Originality/value In this study, firm/environmental-related factors, job-related factors, employee-related factors and EP are incorporated in a single model using data from small- and medium-sized enterprises. Overall, the final model can explain 27 percent of EP variance (first-level analysis) and 42 percent of EP variance (second-level analysis).
引用
收藏
页码:171 / 193
页数:23
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2006, PERFORMANCE MANAGEME
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1997, Commitment in the workplace
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2007, OXFORD HDB HUMAN RES
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1999, The changing nature of work performance: Implications for staffing, personnel actions, and development, DOI DOI 10.21236/ADA397319
[5]  
Armstrong M., 2012, A handbook of human resource management practice, V12th
[6]   Human Capital Investments and Employee Performance: An Analysis of IT Services Industry [J].
Bapna, Ravi ;
Langer, Nishtha ;
Mehra, Amit ;
Gopal, Ram ;
Gupta, Alok .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2013, 59 (03) :641-658
[7]   The effects of flexibility in employee skills, employee behaviors, and human resource practices on firm performance [J].
Bhattacharya, M ;
Gibson, DE .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2005, 31 (04) :622-640
[8]  
Boxall PeterJohn Purcell., 2011, STRATEGY HUMAN RESOU, V3rd
[9]   Workforce agility: the new employee strategy for the knowledge economy [J].
Breu, K ;
Hemingway, CJ ;
Strathern, M ;
Bridger, D .
JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 2002, 17 (01) :21-31
[10]   COMMUNICATION IN A NETWORK ORGANIZATION [J].
BUSH, JB ;
FROHMAN, AL .
ORGANIZATIONAL DYNAMICS, 1991, 20 (02) :23-36