Affective Valence of Words Differentially Affects Visual and Auditory Word Recognition

被引:12
作者
Gao, Chuanji [1 ]
Shinkareva, Svetlana, V [2 ]
Peelen, Marius, V [1 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Donders Inst Brain Cognit & Behav, NL-6525 HR Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Univ South Carolina, Dept Psychol, Inst Mind & Brain, Columbia, SC 29208 USA
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
auditory; emotion; valence; visual; word recognition; INTERACTIVE ACTIVATION MODEL; LEXICAL DECISION; AUTOMATIC VIGILANCE; NEGATIVE WORDS; ATTENTIONAL CAPTURE; LETTER PERCEPTION; EMOTIONAL WORDS; FREQUENCY; NEIGHBORHOOD; CONCRETENESS;
D O I
10.1037/xge0001176
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Recognizing written or spoken words involves a sequence of processing stages, transforming sensory features into lexical-semantic representations. Whereas the later processing stages are common across modalities, the initial stages are modality-specific. In the visual modality, previous studies have shown that words with positive valence are recognized faster than neutral words. Here, we examined whether the effects of valence on word recognition are specific to the visual modality or are common across visual and auditory modalities. To address this question, we analyzed multiple large databases of visual and auditory lexical decision tasks, relating the valence of words to lexical decision times while controlling for a large number of variables, including arousal and frequency. We found that valence differentially influenced visual and auditory word recognition. Valence had an asymmetric effect on visual lexical decision times, primarily speeding up recognition of positive words. By contrast, valence had a symmetric effect on auditory lexical decision times, with both negative and positive words speeding up word recognition relative to neutral words. The modality-specificity of valence effects were consistent across databases and were observed when the same sets of words were compared across modalities. We interpret these findings as indicating that valence influences word recognition partly at the sensory-perceptual stage. We relate these effects to the effects of positive (reward) and negative (punishment) reinforcers on perception.
引用
收藏
页码:2144 / 2159
页数:16
相关论文
共 88 条
[61]   CROWDSOURCING A WORD-EMOTION ASSOCIATION LEXICON [J].
Mohammad, Saif M. ;
Turney, Peter D. .
COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE, 2013, 29 (03) :436-465
[62]   Perceptual load does not modulate auditory distractor processing [J].
Murphy, Sandra ;
Fraenkel, Nick ;
Dalton, Polly .
COGNITION, 2013, 129 (02) :345-355
[63]   Electrical neuroimaging reveals early generator modulation to emotional words [J].
Ortigue, S ;
Michel, CM ;
Murray, MM ;
Mohr, C ;
Carbonnel, S ;
Landis, T .
NEUROIMAGE, 2004, 21 (04) :1242-1251
[64]   AUTOMATIC VIGILANCE - THE ATTENTION-GRABBING POWER OF NEGATIVE SOCIAL INFORMATION [J].
PRATTO, F ;
JOHN, OP .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1991, 61 (03) :380-391
[65]   A diffusion model account of the lexical decision task [J].
Ratcliff, R ;
Gomez, P ;
McKoon, G .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2004, 111 (01) :159-182
[66]   Does Modality Matter? The Effects of Reading, Listening, and Dual Modality on Comprehension [J].
Rogowsky, Beth A. ;
Calhoun, Barbara M. ;
Tallal, Paula .
SAGE OPEN, 2016, 6 (03)
[67]   A THEORY OF EMOTION, AND ITS APPLICATION TO UNDERSTANDING THE NEURAL BASIS OF EMOTION [J].
ROLLS, ET .
COGNITION & EMOTION, 1990, 4 (03) :161-190
[68]   AN INTERACTIVE ACTIVATION MODEL OF CONTEXT EFFECTS IN LETTER PERCEPTION .2. THE CONTEXTUAL ENHANCEMENT EFFECT AND SOME TESTS AND EXTENSIONS OF THE MODEL [J].
RUMELHART, DE ;
MCCLELLAND, JL .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1982, 89 (01) :60-94
[69]   Rapid Detection of Emotion from Human Vocalizations [J].
Sauter, Disa Anna ;
Eimer, Martin .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2010, 22 (03) :474-481
[70]   Association with positive outcome induces early effects in event-related brain potentials [J].
Schacht, Annekathrin ;
Adler, Nele ;
Chen, Peiyao ;
Guo, Taomei ;
Sommer, Werner .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 89 (01) :130-136