Marital satisfaction and marital discord as risk markers for intimate partner violence: A meta-analytic review

被引:153
|
作者
Stith, Sandra M. [1 ]
Green, Narkia M. [2 ]
Smith, Douglas B. [3 ]
Ward, David B. [4 ]
机构
[1] Kansas State Univ, Manhattan, KS 66506 USA
[2] Virginia Polytech Inst & State Univ, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
[3] Texas Tech Univ, Lubbock, TX 79409 USA
[4] Pacific Lutheran Univ, Tacoma, WA 98447 USA
关键词
marital satisfaction; marital discord; risk markers; intimate partner violence; gender; meta-analysis;
D O I
10.1007/s10896-007-9137-4
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
A meta-analysis investigating the relationship between marital satisfaction/discord and intimate partner violence (IPV) in heterosexual relationships was conducted with 32 articles. Overall, a small-to-moderate effect size (r = -0.27) indicated a significant and negative relationship existed between marital satisfaction/discord and IPV. Moderator analyses found no differences between effect size based on construct examined (discord or satisfaction). However, the magnitudes of observed effect sizes were influenced by other moderator variables, including the use of standardized versus non-standardized measures, gender of the offender and victim, role in the violence (perpetrator versus victim), and sample type (clinical versus community). The data suggests that gender is an especially important moderator variable in understanding the relationship between marital satisfaction/discord and IPV.
引用
收藏
页码:149 / 160
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] VERBAL MARITAL CONFLICT AND MALE DOMINATION IN THE FAMILY AS RISK FACTORS OF INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE
    Vives-Cases, Carmen
    Gil-Gonzalez, Diana
    Carrasco-Portino, Mercedes
    TRAUMA VIOLENCE & ABUSE, 2009, 10 (02) : 171 - 180
  • [22] Which battering interventions work? An updated Meta-analytic review of intimate partner violence treatment outcome research
    Babcock, Julia C.
    Gallagher, Matthew W.
    Richardson, Angela
    Godfrey, Andrew
    Reeves, Victoria E.
    D'Souza, Johan
    CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2024, 111
  • [23] Marital Infidelity and Intimate Partner Violence in Rural Malawi: A Dyadic Investigation
    Conroy, Amy A.
    ARCHIVES OF SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, 2014, 43 (07) : 1303 - 1314
  • [24] Marital Infidelity and Intimate Partner Violence in Rural Malawi: A Dyadic Investigation
    Amy A. Conroy
    Archives of Sexual Behavior, 2014, 43 : 1303 - 1314
  • [25] Gender, Marital Status, and Children as Risk Factors for Burnout in Nurses: A Meta-Analytic Study
    Canadas-De la Fuente, Guillermo A.
    Ortega, Elena
    Ramirez-Baena, Lucia
    De la Fuente-Solana, Emilia I.
    Vargas, Cristina
    Luis Gomez-Urquiza, Jose
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 15 (10)
  • [26] Effects of Childhood Experiences of Family Violence on Adult Partner Violence: A Meta-Analytic Review
    Smith-Marek, Erika N.
    Cafferky, Bryan
    Dharnidharka, Prerana
    Mallory, Allen B.
    Dominguez, Mara
    High, Jessica
    Stith, Sandra M.
    Mendez, Marcos
    JOURNAL OF FAMILY THEORY & REVIEW, 2015, 7 (04) : 498 - 519
  • [27] Psychopathy and Violence Between Intimate Partners: Systematic Review with Meta-Analytic Procedure
    Azeredo, Andreia
    Figueiredo, Patricia
    Moreira, Diana
    Barbosa, Fernando
    VICTIMS & OFFENDERS, 2025,
  • [28] You belong to me! Meta-analytic review of the use of male control and dominance against women in intimate partner violence
    Ubillos-Landa, Silvia
    Puente-Martinez, Alicia
    Luis Gonzalez-Castro, Jose
    Nieto-Gonzalez, Sandra
    AGGRESSION AND VIOLENT BEHAVIOR, 2020, 52
  • [29] Intimate Partner Aggression and Marital Satisfaction: A Cross-Lagged Panel Analysis
    Hammett, Julia F.
    Lavner, Justin A.
    Karney, Benjamin R.
    Bradbury, Thomas N.
    JOURNAL OF INTERPERSONAL VIOLENCE, 2021, 36 (3-4) : NP1463 - NP1481
  • [30] Examining the linkages between marital quality and anxiety: A meta-analytic review(sic)(sic)(sic)
    Postler, Kaicee Beal
    Helms, Heather M.
    Anastopoulos, Arthur D.
    FAMILY PROCESS, 2022, 61 (04) : 1456 - 1472