A Quantitative Exploration of Reconciliation: Evidence from Colombia

被引:1
作者
Sanandres Campis, Eliana [1 ]
Molinares-Guerrero, Ivonne [1 ]
Gonzalez Arana, Roberto [1 ]
Martinez Perez, Melissa [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Norte, Dept Hist & Social Sci, Div Humanities & Social Sci, Barranquilla 080001, Colombia
[2] Univ Norte, Social Dev, Barranquilla 080001, Colombia
来源
SOCIAL SCIENCES-BASEL | 2022年 / 11卷 / 10期
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
reconciliation; peacebuilding; conflict; measurement; Colombia; TRANSITIONAL JUSTICE; CONFLICT; DEMOBILIZATION; VICTIMS; MEMBERS;
D O I
10.3390/socsci11100456
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
The reconciliation of societies in negotiated transitions from civil war to peace represents a practical challenge. While the political dimension concerns the construction of socio-political relations, the interpersonal dimension focuses on intergroup relationships. Empirical evidence shows that reconciliation should not assign primacy to one dimension over another; rather, it should address the interaction between them. However, research on this topic is scarce. There is a need to develop an instrument to assess the political and interpersonal dimensions of reconciliation in peacebuilding contexts. This study developed the Political and Interpersonal Reconciliation Scale (PIRS) and assessed its psychometric properties based on a sample of Colombian population after the peace agreement between the Colombian government and the FARC guerrilla group. The results show the validity of a factorial structure for two components as well as an acceptable Cronbach's alpha. Concerning external validity, in line with the existing literature, the scale under study was positively related to confidence in the peace agreement, trust in the ex-combatants, willingness to share with the adversary and community identification. This study provides evidence that the Political and Interpersonal Reconciliation Scale is a valid and reliable instrument for evaluating reconciliation in peacebuilding contexts.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
Afzali Aneelah., 2003, Imagine Coexistence: Restoring Humanity after Violent Ethnic Conflict, P3
[2]  
Alzate Mónica, 2017, Univ. Psychol., V16, P16, DOI 10.11144/javeriana.upsy16-3.rset
[3]   Antecedents of the attitude towards inter-group reconciliation in a setting of armed conflict [J].
Alzate, Monica ;
Manuel Sabucedo, Jose ;
Duran, Mar .
PSICOTHEMA, 2013, 25 (01) :61-66
[4]  
Alzate M, 2009, UNIV PSYCHOL, V8, P703
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2017, PROGRAMA ALIANZAS RE
[6]  
Bar-Tal Daniel., 2004, CONFLICT RESOLUTION, P11
[7]  
Bloomfield D., 2003, Reconciliation after violent conflict
[8]  
Bloomfield David., 2006, On Good Terms: Clarifying Reconciliation
[9]   Between trust and distrust in research with participants in conflict context [J].
Celestina, Mateja .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2018, 21 (03) :373-383
[10]  
Celina OviedoH., 2005, Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatria, VXXXIV, P572, DOI [DOI 10.1590/S1135-57272002000200001, DOI 10.7705/BIOMEDICA.V26I4.327]