Determining Reliability of Daily Measures: An Illustration with Data on Teacher Stress

被引:14
作者
van Alphen, Thijmen [1 ]
Jak, Suzanne [1 ]
de Wal, Joost Jansen In [1 ]
Schuitema, Jaap [1 ]
Peetsma, Thea [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Res Inst Child Dev & Educ, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
CONFIRMATORY FACTOR-ANALYSIS; FIT INDEXES; MULTILEVEL; INVARIANCE; MODEL; BIAS;
D O I
10.1080/08957347.2022.2034822
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Intensive longitudinal data is increasingly used to study state-like processes such as changes in daily stress. Measures aimed at collecting such data require the same level of scrutiny regarding scale reliability as traditional questionnaires. The most prevalent methods used to assess reliability of intensive longitudinal measures are based on the generalizability theory or a multilevel factor analytic approach. However, the application of recent improvements made for the factor analytic approach may not be readily applicable for all researchers. Therefore, this article illustrates a five-step approach for determining reliability of daily data, which is one type of intensive longitudinal data. First, we show how the proposed reliability equations are applied. Next, we illustrate how these equations are used as part of our five-step approach with empirical data, originating from a study investigating changes in daily stress of secondary school teachers. The results are a within-level (omega(w)), between-level (omega(b)) reliability score. Mplus syntax for these examples is included and discussed. As such, this paper anticipates on the need for comprehensive guides for the analysis of daily data.
引用
收藏
页码:63 / 79
页数:17
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
Asparouhov T., 2005, P FED COMM STAT METH, P14
[2]  
Asparouhov T., 2012, Mplus Web Notes, V16
[3]  
Bolger N., 2013, Intensive longitudinal methods
[4]  
Brennan R. L., 2001, GEN THEORY
[5]  
Brown TA., 2015, Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research
[6]  
Browne M.W., 1993, SOCIOL METHOD RES, P445
[7]   A procedure for evaluating sensitivity to within-person change: Can mood measures in diary studies detect change reliably? [J].
Cranford, James A. ;
Shrout, Patrick E. ;
Iida, Masumi ;
Rafaeli, Eshkol ;
Yip, Tiffany ;
Bolger, Niall .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 2006, 32 (07) :917-929
[8]  
CRONBACH LJ, 1951, PSYCHOMETRIKA, V16, P297, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF02310555
[9]   The case for positive emotions in the stress process [J].
Folkman, Susan .
ANXIETY STRESS AND COPING, 2008, 21 (01) :3-14
[10]   Reliability Estimation in a Multilevel Confirmatory Factor Analysis Framework [J].
Geldhof, G. John ;
Preacher, Kristopher J. ;
Zyphur, Michael J. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2014, 19 (01) :72-91