Key Elements and Their Roles in Entrepreneurship Education Ecosystem: Comparative Review and Suggestions for Sustainability

被引:19
作者
Liu, Haibin [1 ]
Kulturel-Konak, Sadan [2 ]
Konak, Abdullah [3 ]
机构
[1] Northeast Normal Univ, Inst Employment & Entrepreneurship Educ, Changchun 130024, Peoples R China
[2] Penn State Berks, Management Informat Syst, Reading, PA 19610 USA
[3] Penn State Berks, Informat Sci & Technol, Reading, PA 19610 USA
关键词
entrepreneurship education; university-based ecosystem; key elements; development process; sustainable construction strategy; SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP; UNIVERSITY; INNOVATION; TECHNOLOGY; INTENTION; POLICY; PROGRAMS; ECOLOGY; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.3390/su131910648
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper examines two core issues of the university-based entrepreneurship education ecosystem by explicating the key elements of the ecosystem and their roles, and the development process and sustainable construction strategy of the ecosystem. Thirty stakeholders of ecosystems from the US universities were interviewed, and the transcripts of these interviews were coded through a three-phase process, including open, axial, selective coding, and were analyzed based on the grounded theory. It was found that (i) the key elements of the university-based entrepreneurship education ecosystem consist of six units (colleges and universities, learners, educators, government, industry, and community) acting as initiators and seven factors (entrepreneurship curriculum, entrepreneurial activities and practices, organizational structure, resources, leadership vision, core faculty, and operating mechanism) acting as the intermediaries; (ii) These key elements constitute three independent functional subsystems, namely, teaching and innovation, support, and operation that are interconnected by the universities; (iii) The development process of a university-based entrepreneurship education ecosystem involves seven steps as preparation, germination, growth, equilibrium, stagnation, recession, and collapse; (iv) For sustainability, suggestions on a solid foundation, continuous investment, and constant monitoring are provided to university administrators and policymakers to advance higher education's contribution to social and economic development.
引用
收藏
页数:28
相关论文
共 96 条
[1]   The lineages of the entrepreneurial ecosystem approach [J].
Acs, Zoltan J. ;
Stam, Erik ;
Audretsch, David B. ;
O'Connor, Allan .
SMALL BUSINESS ECONOMICS, 2017, 49 (01) :1-10
[2]   National Systems of Entrepreneurship: Measurement issues and policy implications [J].
Acs, Zoltan J. ;
Autio, Erkko ;
Szerb, Laszlo .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2014, 43 (03) :476-494
[3]   Ecosystem as Structure: An Actionable Construct for Strategy [J].
Adner, Ron .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2017, 43 (01) :39-58
[4]   VALUE CREATION IN INNOVATION ECOSYSTEMS: HOW THE STRUCTURE OF TECHNOLOGICAL INTERDEPENDENCE AFFECTS FIRM PERFORMANCE IN NEW TECHNOLOGY GENERATIONS [J].
Adner, Ron ;
Kapoor, Rahul .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2010, 31 (03) :306-333
[5]   CUI BONO? THE SELECTIVE REVEALING OF KNOWLEDGE AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR INNOVATIVE ACTIVITY [J].
Alexy, Oliver ;
George, Gerard ;
Salter, Ammon J. .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2013, 38 (02) :270-291
[6]  
Antal N, 2014, ADV STUD ENTREP INNO, V24, P227, DOI 10.1108/S1048-473620140000024009
[7]  
Autio E., 2018, Open Innovation, Ecosystems and Entrepreneurship: Issues and Perspectives, P111
[8]   Using patents to orchestrate ecosystem stability: the case of a French aerospace company [J].
Azzam, Jamal Eddine ;
Ayerbe, Cecile ;
Dang, Rani .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2017, 75 (1-4) :97-120
[9]  
Bahrami H, 2010, SUPER-FLEXIBILITY FOR KNOWLEDGE ENTERPRISES: A TOOLKIT FOR DYNAMIC ADAPTATION, SECOND EDITION, P43, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-02447-4_3
[10]   Sustainable Growth Approaches: Quadruple Helix Approach for Turning Brasov into a Startup City [J].
Barbulescu, Oana ;
Constantin, Cristinel Petrisor .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (21)