Introduction to evaluating energy justice across the life cycle: A social life cycle assessment approach

被引:80
作者
Fortier, Marie-Odile P. [1 ]
Teron, Lemir [2 ]
Reames, Tony G. [3 ]
Munardy, Dynta Trishana [4 ]
Sullivan, Breck M. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Merced, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, 5200 N Lake Rd, Merced, CA 95343 USA
[2] SUNY Coll Environm Sci & Forestry, Dept Environm Studies, 211 Marshall Hall,One Forestry Dr, Syracuse, NY 13210 USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Sch Environm & Sustainabil, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[4] SUNY Coll Environm Sci & Forestry, Dept Forest & Nat Resources Management, 320 Bray Hall,One Forestry Dr, Syracuse, NY 13210 USA
[5] SUNY Coll Environm Sci & Forestry, Div Environm Sci, 202 Baker Lab,One Forestry Dr, Syracuse, NY 13210 USA
关键词
Energy justice; Social life cycle assessment; Method development; Indicators; Renewable energy systems; Electrical energy systems; RENEWABLE ENERGY; FRAMEWORK; ISSUES;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.11.022
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
As our energy systems are transitioning towards low-carbon energy sources and their environmental and economic sustainability are assessed, their potential social impacts must also be determined. These social impacts may be disproportionate to a population, leading to energy justice concerns. The social life cycle assessment framework can be used to comprehensively address energy justice concerns by different stakeholder groups and at all life cycle stages associated with a low-carbon energy system. Indicators for a social life cycle assessment framework that addresses energy justice are introduced and discussed. These indicators are organized by four categories of stakeholders for electrical energy systems: workers, electricity consumers, local communities, and society as a whole. The social life cycle assessment framework allows for variations in justice and equity to be determined not only at the generation stage, but through multiple points in the life cycle of the same energy system, from raw material extraction, through manufacturing, transportation, distribution, electricity generation, and waste management. This framework can address potential energy justice issues along the life cycle of new energy systems and assist in their design and planning for optimizing their social sustainability without overlooking vulnerable populations.
引用
收藏
页码:211 / 219
页数:9
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
Andrews E.S., 2000, Guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products
[2]  
[Anonymous], INT J LIFE CYCLE ASS
[3]   Participation promotes acceptance [J].
Baxter, Jamie .
NATURE ENERGY, 2017, 2 (08)
[4]  
Benoit-Norris C., 2013, The Methodological Sheets for Sub-Categories in Social Life Cycle Assessment
[5]   Introducing the UNEP/SETAC methodological sheets for subcategories of social LCA [J].
Benoit-Norris, Catherine ;
Vickery-Niederman, Gina ;
Valdivia, Sonia ;
Franze, Juliane ;
Traverso, Marzia ;
Ciroth, Andreas ;
Mazijn, Bernard .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2011, 16 (07) :682-690
[6]  
Byrne J., 2002, ENVIRON JUSTICE, P97
[7]  
Cassell B., 2015, APPEALS COURT TOSSES
[8]  
Daley DM, 2015, AM COMP ENVIRON POLI, P143
[9]   Conceptualising energy use and energy poverty using a capabilities framework [J].
Day, Rosie ;
Walker, Gordon ;
Simcock, Neil .
ENERGY POLICY, 2016, 93 :255-264
[10]   Incorporating low frequency noise legislation for the energy industry in Alberta, Canada [J].
DeGagne, David C. ;
Lapka, Stephanie D. .
JOURNAL OF LOW FREQUENCY NOISE VIBRATION AND ACTIVE CONTROL, 2008, 27 (02) :105-120