Does Firm Size make a Difference? Analysing the Effectiveness of R&D Subsidies in East Germany

被引:114
作者
Alecke, Bjoern [1 ]
Mitze, Timo [2 ]
Reinkowski, Janina
Untiedt, Gerhard [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Gesell Finanz & Reg Anal GEFRA Munster, Munster, Germany
[2] Ruhr Univ Bochum, Bochum, Germany
[3] GEFRA Munster, Munster, Germany
[4] Tech Univ Clausthal, Clausthal Zellerfeld, Germany
关键词
Propensity score matching; R&D subsidies; East Germany; SME;
D O I
10.1111/j.1468-0475.2011.00546.x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We analyse the impact of public subsidies on private sector research and development (R&D) activity for a sample of East German firms. Using propensity score matching, our empirical results indicate that subsidized firms indeed show a higher level of R&D intensity (R&D expenditures relative to total turnover) and a higher probability for patent application compared with non-subsidized firms. We find that, on average, the R&D intensity increases from 1.5% to 3.9%. The probability of patent application rises from 20% to 40%. These results closely match earlier empirical findings for East Germany. Given the fact that the East German innovation system is particularly driven by small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), we draw special attention to the effectiveness of R&D subsidies for this latter subgroup. Here, no specific empirical evidence is available so far. Our findings indicate that policy effectiveness also holds for private R&D activity of SMEs, with the highest increase in terms of R&D intensity being estimated for microbusinesses with up to ten employees.
引用
收藏
页码:174 / 195
页数:22
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   The effects of public R&D subsidies on firms' innovation activities: The case of Eastern Germany [J].
Almus, M ;
Czarnitzki, D .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & ECONOMIC STATISTICS, 2003, 21 (02) :226-236
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Springer Series in Statistics
[3]   Export behavior and firm productivity in German manufacturing: A firm-level analysis [J].
Arnold, JM ;
Hussinger, K .
REVIEW OF WORLD ECONOMICS, 2005, 141 (02) :219-243
[4]  
Aschhoff B., 2009, ZEW DISCUSSION PAPER
[5]  
Augurzky B., 2001, IZA Discussion paper series
[6]   Estimation of average treatment effects based on propensity scores [J].
Becker, Sascha O. ;
Ichino, Andrea .
STATA JOURNAL, 2002, 2 (04) :358-377
[7]   Sensitivity analysis for average treatment effects [J].
Becker, Sascha O. ;
Caliendo, Marco .
STATA JOURNAL, 2007, 7 (01) :71-83
[8]  
BUTTNER B, 2006, GER ECON REV, V7, P297
[9]   Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity score matching [J].
Caliendo, Marco ;
Kopeinig, Sabine .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC SURVEYS, 2008, 22 (01) :31-72
[10]  
Carboni O, 2008, 200815 CRENOS