Assessing potency of high- and low-preference reinforcers with respect to response rate and response pattterns

Previous research has suggested that the availability of high-preference stimuli may override the reinforcing efficacy of concurrently available low-preference stimuli under relatively low schedule requirements (e.g., fixed-ratio I schedule). It is unknown if similar effects would be obtained under higher schedule requirements. Thus, the current study compared high-preference and low-preference reinforcers under progressively increasing schedule requirements. Results for 3 of the 4 participants indicated that high-preference stimuli maintained responding under higher schedule requirements relative to low-preference stimuli. For I participant, high-preference and low-preference stimuli were demonstrated to be equally effective reinforcers; under increasing schedule requirements. Implications with respect to rate of performance and response patterns are discussed.