Neuroscience and the Criminal Justice System

被引:20
作者
Greely, Henry T. [1 ]
Farahany, Nita A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Stanford Law Sch, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Sch Law, Durham, NC 27708 USA
来源
ANNUAL REVIEW OF CRIMINOLOGY, VOL 2 | 2019年 / 2卷
关键词
neuroscience; neuroimaging; evidence; prediction; recidivism; treatment; BEHAVIOR; NEUROPREDICTION; MAOA;
D O I
10.1146/annurev-criminol-011518-024433
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
The criminal justice system acts directly on bodies, but fundamentally it cares about minds. As neuroscience progresses, it will increasingly be able to probe the objective, physical organ of the brain and reveal secrets from the subjective mind. This is already beginning to affect the criminal justice system, a trend that will only increase. This review article cannot begin even to sketch the full scope of the new field of law and neuroscience. The first workshop on the subject was held in 2003 (Garland 2004), but the field already has its own casebook (Jones et al. 2014) and the MacArthur Foundation Research Network on Law and Neuroscience (2018) shows more than 1,700 publications in the area between 1984 and 2017. Greely (2009) divided the implications of law into five different categories: prediction, mind-reading, responsibility, treatment, and enhancement. This article examines only three points: the current use of neuroscience to understand and explain criminal behavior, the possibilities of relevant neuroscience-based prediction, and plausible future applications of neuroscience to the treatment of criminals. But first, we discuss the human brain and how it works.
引用
收藏
页码:451 / 471
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The role of criminal justice system in treating drug abusers: The Chinese experience
    Zhang, Lening
    Liu, Jianhong
    Huang, Kaicheng
    JOURNAL OF SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT, 2011, 41 (01) : 45 - 54
  • [32] Lost diagnoses? A multi-year trajectory of patients with childhood ADHD in the criminal justice system in Switzerland
    Wyler, Helen
    van Wijnkoop, Moritz
    Smith, Alexander
    Retz, Wolfgang
    Liebrenz, Michael
    Buadze, Ana
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY, 2024, 15
  • [33] The Subjective Impact of Contact With the Criminal Justice System: The Role of Gender and Stigmatization
    McGrath, Andrew James
    CRIME & DELINQUENCY, 2014, 60 (06) : 884 - 908
  • [34] Re-wiring Guilt: How Advancing Neuroscience Encourages Strategic Interventions Over Retributive Justice
    Anderson, Nathaniel E.
    Kiehl, Kent A.
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 11
  • [35] The Emerging Social Neuroscience of Justice Motivation
    Decety, Jean
    Yoder, Keith J.
    TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2017, 21 (01) : 6 - 14
  • [36] Towards a More Evidence-Based Risk Assessment for People in the Criminal Justice System: the Case of OxRec in the Netherlands
    Seena Fazel
    Amir Sariaslan
    Thomas Fanshawe
    European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 2022, 28 : 397 - 406
  • [37] Towards a More Evidence-Based Risk Assessment for People in the Criminal Justice System: the Case of OxRec in the Netherlands
    Fazel, Seena
    Sariaslan, Amir
    Fanshawe, Thomas
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL ON CRIMINAL POLICY AND RESEARCH, 2022, 28 (03) : 397 - 406
  • [38] Key Risk Factors for Relapse and Rearrest Among Substance Use Treatment Patients Involved in the Criminal Justice System
    Kopak, Albert M.
    Hoffmann, Norman G.
    Proctor, Steven L.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, 2016, 41 (01) : 14 - 30
  • [39] The use of behavioural genetics in the criminal justice system: A disability & human rights perspective
    O'Mahony, Charles
    de Paor, Aisling
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LAW AND PSYCHIATRY, 2017, 54 : 16 - 25
  • [40] Sentencing and placement of offenders with dementia: a significant contemporary challenge for the criminal justice system
    Anderson, John
    Baird, Amee
    PSYCHIATRY PSYCHOLOGY AND LAW, 2024,