Neuroscience and the Criminal Justice System

被引:20
作者
Greely, Henry T. [1 ]
Farahany, Nita A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Stanford Law Sch, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Sch Law, Durham, NC 27708 USA
来源
ANNUAL REVIEW OF CRIMINOLOGY, VOL 2 | 2019年 / 2卷
关键词
neuroscience; neuroimaging; evidence; prediction; recidivism; treatment; BEHAVIOR; NEUROPREDICTION; MAOA;
D O I
10.1146/annurev-criminol-011518-024433
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
The criminal justice system acts directly on bodies, but fundamentally it cares about minds. As neuroscience progresses, it will increasingly be able to probe the objective, physical organ of the brain and reveal secrets from the subjective mind. This is already beginning to affect the criminal justice system, a trend that will only increase. This review article cannot begin even to sketch the full scope of the new field of law and neuroscience. The first workshop on the subject was held in 2003 (Garland 2004), but the field already has its own casebook (Jones et al. 2014) and the MacArthur Foundation Research Network on Law and Neuroscience (2018) shows more than 1,700 publications in the area between 1984 and 2017. Greely (2009) divided the implications of law into five different categories: prediction, mind-reading, responsibility, treatment, and enhancement. This article examines only three points: the current use of neuroscience to understand and explain criminal behavior, the possibilities of relevant neuroscience-based prediction, and plausible future applications of neuroscience to the treatment of criminals. But first, we discuss the human brain and how it works.
引用
收藏
页码:451 / 471
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] People with intellectual disability who offend or are involved with the criminal justice system
    Lindsay, William R.
    CURRENT OPINION IN PSYCHIATRY, 2011, 24 (05) : 377 - 381
  • [2] Diversion in the Criminal Justice System
    Mueller-Smith, Michael
    Schnepel, Kevin T.
    REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2021, 88 (02) : 883 - 936
  • [3] The Intersection of Racism and Neuroscience Technology: A Cautionary Tale for the Criminal Legal System
    Perkins, Emily R.
    Bradford, Daniel E.
    Verona, Edelyn
    Hamilton, Roy H.
    Joyner, Keanan J.
    POLICY INSIGHTS FROM THE BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 2023, 10 (02) : 279 - 286
  • [4] Neuroscience nuance: dissecting the relevance of neuroscience in adjudicating criminal culpability
    Slobogin, Christopher
    JOURNAL OF LAW AND THE BIOSCIENCES, 2017, 4 (03): : 577 - 593
  • [5] Estimating the effects of shrinking the criminal justice system on criminal recidivism
    Loeffler, Charles E.
    Braga, Anthony A.
    CRIMINOLOGY & PUBLIC POLICY, 2022, 21 (03) : 595 - 617
  • [6] Neuroenhancement, the Criminal Justice System, and the Problem of Alienation
    Varelius, Jukka
    NEUROETHICS, 2020, 13 (03) : 325 - 335
  • [7] Detainees' Perceptions of Procedural Justice: An Examination Throughout the Criminal Justice System
    van Hall, Matthias
    Dirkzwager, Anja J. E.
    van der Laan, Peter H.
    Nieuwbeerta, Paul
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OFFENDER THERAPY AND COMPARATIVE CRIMINOLOGY, 2024, 68 (13-14) : 1323 - 1341
  • [8] Neuroprediction and AI in Forensic Psychiatry and Criminal Justice: A Neurolaw Perspective
    Tortora, Leda
    Meynen, Gerben
    Bijlsma, Johannes
    Tronci, Enrico
    Ferracuti, Stefano
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 11
  • [9] On the Relevance of Neuroscience to Criminal Responsibility
    Vincent, Nicole A.
    CRIMINAL LAW AND PHILOSOPHY, 2010, 4 (01) : 77 - 98
  • [10] Experiences of people with learning disabilities in the criminal justice system
    Hyun, Elly
    Hahn, Lyndsey
    McConnell, David
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF LEARNING DISABILITIES, 2014, 42 (04) : 308 - 314