Does individual learning styles influence the choice to use a web-based ECG learning programme in a blended learning setting?

被引:19
作者
Nilsson, Mikael [1 ]
Ostergren, Jan [1 ]
Fors, Uno [2 ]
Rickenlund, Anette [3 ]
Jorfeldt, Lennart [3 ]
Caidahl, Kenneth [3 ]
Bolinder, Gunilla [1 ]
机构
[1] Karolinska Inst, Dept Med, Karolinska Univ Hosp Solna, S-17176 Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Stockholm Univ, Dept Comp & Syst Sci DSV, S-16440 Kista, Sweden
[3] Karolinska Inst, Dept Mol Med & Surg, Karolinska Univ Hosp Solna, S-17176 Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
MEDICAL-STUDENTS; CROSSOVER TRIAL; VALIDITY; INDEX; RELIABILITY; INSTRUCTION; SCORES;
D O I
10.1186/1472-6920-12-5
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Background: The compressed curriculum in modern knowledge-intensive medicine demands useful tools to achieve approved learning aims in a limited space of time. Web-based learning can be used in different ways to enhance learning. Little is however known regarding its optimal utilisation. Our aim was to investigate if the individual learning styles of medical students influence the choice to use a web-based ECG learning programme in a blended learning setting. Methods: The programme, with three types of modules (learning content, self-assessment questions and interactive ECG interpretation training), was offered on a voluntary basis during a face to face ECG learning course for undergraduate medical students. The Index of Learning Styles (ILS) and a general questionnaire including questions about computer and Internet usage, preferred future speciality and prior experience of E-learning were used to explore different factors related to the choice of using the programme or not. Results: 93 (76%) out of 123 students answered the ILS instrument and 91 the general questionnaire. 55 students (59%) were defined as users of the web-based ECG-interpretation programme. Cronbach's alpha was analysed with coefficients above 0.7 in all of the four dimensions of ILS. There were no significant differences with regard to learning styles, as assessed by ILS, between the user and non-user groups; Active/Reflective; Visual/Verbal; Sensing/Intuitive; and Sequential/Global (p = 0.56-0.96). Neither did gender, prior experience of E-learning or preference for future speciality differ between groups. Conclusion: Among medical students, neither learning styles according to ILS, nor a number of other characteristics seem to influence the choice to use a web-based ECG programme. This finding was consistent also when the usage of the different modules in the programme were considered. Thus, the findings suggest that web-based learning may attract a broad variety of medical students.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], INDEX LEARNING STYLE
[2]   Methods of teaching and evaluating electrocardiogram interpretation skills among cardiology fellowship programs in the United States [J].
Auseon, Alex J. ;
Schaal, Stephen. F. ;
Kolibash, Albert J., Jr. ;
Nagel, Rollin ;
Lucey, Catherine R. ;
Lewis, Richard P. .
JOURNAL OF ELECTROCARDIOLOGY, 2009, 42 (04) :339-344
[3]   Success in Distance Education: Do Learning Styles and Multiple Formats Matter? [J].
Battalio, John .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DISTANCE EDUCATION, 2009, 23 (02) :71-87
[4]  
Bonk C.J., 2006, HDB BLENDED LEARNING
[5]  
Brown T, 2009, AUSTRALAS J EDUC TEC, V25, P524
[6]   Impact of self-assessment questions and learning styles in web-based learning: A randomized, controlled, crossover trial [J].
Cook, DA ;
Thompson, WG ;
Thomas, KG ;
Thomas, MR ;
Pankratz, VS .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2006, 81 (03) :231-238
[7]   Reliability and validity of scores from the index of learning styles [J].
Cook, DA .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2005, 80 (10) :S97-S101
[8]   Learning and cognitive styles in Web-based learning: Theory, evidence, and application [J].
Cook, DA .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2005, 80 (03) :266-278
[9]   Validity of index of learning styles scores: multitrait-multimethod comparison with three cognitive/learning style instruments [J].
Cook, David A. ;
Smith, Alan J. .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2006, 40 (09) :900-907
[10]   Lack of interaction between sensing-intuitive learning styles and problem-first versus information-first instruction: a randomized crossover trial [J].
Cook, David A. ;
Thompson, Warren G. ;
Thomas, Kris G. ;
Thomas, Matthew R. .
ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2009, 14 (01) :79-90