Utilization of eucalyptus for electricity production in Brazil via fast pyrolysis: A techno-economic analysis

被引:23
作者
Pighinelli, Anna L. M. T. [1 ]
Schaffer, Mark A. [2 ]
Boateng, Akwasi A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Brazilian Agr Res Corp, Embrapa Agroenergy, Parque Estagao Biol PqEB S-N Av W3 Norte Final, BR-70770901 Brasilia, DF, Brazil
[2] ARS, Eastern Reg Res Ctr, USDA, 600 E Mermaid Lane, Wyndmoor, PA 19038 USA
关键词
Eucalyptus benthamii; Pyrolysis oil; Electricity; BIOMASS FAST PYROLYSIS; BIOFUEL PRODUCTION; BIO-OIL; POWER-GENERATION; TRANSPORTATION FUELS; COMBUSTION; GASIFICATION; PERFORMANCE; ECONOMICS; LIQUIDS;
D O I
10.1016/j.renene.2017.12.036
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
A process model of a 2000 metric ton per day eucalyptus Tail Gas Reactive Pyrolysis (TGRP) and electricity generation plant was developed and simulated in Pro/II software for the purpose of evaluating its techno-economic viability in Brazil. Two scenarios were compared based on operational conditions in the country: a single biomass to bio-oil TGRP production facility and a distributed/satellite processing that consists of several small TGRP production facilities with aggregate capacity similar to the single one, both feeding into one centralized electricity generation plant. The selling price at the breakeven point of the electricity generated via TGRP was estimated to be US$0.34 and US$0.62 per kWh for the single and the distributed scenarios respectively, considering a 10-year payback period. The single capacity pyrolysis and electricity generation facility is found to have better economic benefits over the distributed plants of small sizes under the current conditions in Brazil. The results therefore indicate that pyrolysis of eucalyptus wood for electricity in a single facility cannot be competitive With the current electricity cost in Brazil (US$0.08-0.13/kWh) at present time. Considering auxiliary benefits such as climate change and carbon credits, plus the continuous increasing in the electricity market price in Brazil, both scenarios could be competitive in the future. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:590 / 597
页数:8
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
ABRAF, 2013, YB STAT BRAS ASS FOR
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2015, GUARDIAN
[3]  
Brazil, 2016, BRAS EN BAL 2016 YEA
[4]  
Brazil Brazilian Electricity Regulatory Agency, 2016, EL RAT
[5]   A techno-economic comparison of power production by biomass fast pyrolysis with gasification and combustion [J].
Bridgwater, AV ;
Toft, AJ ;
Brammer, JG .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2002, 6 (03) :181-248
[6]   Techno-economic impacts of shale gas on cellulosic biofuel pathways [J].
Brown, Tristan R. ;
Wright, Mark M. .
FUEL, 2014, 117 :989-995
[7]   Techno-economic analysis of biomass to transportation fuels and electricity via fast pyrolysis and hydroprocessing [J].
Brown, Tristan R. ;
Thilakaratne, Rajeeva ;
Brown, Robert C. ;
Hu, Guiping .
FUEL, 2013, 106 :463-469
[8]   Economics of biomass energy utilization in combustion and gasification plants: effects of logistic variables [J].
Caputo, AC ;
Palumbo, M ;
Pelagagge, PM ;
Scacchia, F .
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2005, 28 (01) :35-51
[9]   Pyrolysis of forest residues: An approach to techno-economics, for bio-fuel production [J].
Carrasco, Jose L. ;
Gunukula, Sampath ;
Boateng, Akwasi A. ;
Mullen, Charles A. ;
DeSisto, William J. ;
Wheeler, M. Clayton .
FUEL, 2017, 193 :477-484
[10]   Power generation using fast pyrolysis liquids from biomass [J].
Chiaramonti, David ;
Oasmaa, Anja ;
Solantausta, Yrjo .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2007, 11 (06) :1056-1086