Implications and consequences of enzyme induction on preclinical and clinical drug development

被引:31
作者
Worboys, PD
Carlile, DJ
机构
[1] Celltech Ltd, Cambridge CB1 6GS, England
[2] Merck Sharp & Dohme Ltd, Neurosci Res Ctr, Harlow CM20 2QR, Essex, England
关键词
D O I
10.1080/00498250110054623
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
1. Enzyme induction has traditionally been studied during drug development to assess the potential of drug entities to interact with concomitant medications and alter their pharmacological effects, and clearly it is an unwanted phenomenon. However, another hurdle caused by induction occurs during preclinical development via the attainment of safety data, obtained by dosing high quantities of compound to species used in toxicology assessment. This review considers the techniques that can now be utilized in drug discovery, their relevance, the pharmacokinetic aspects of this phenomenon, and it discusses the consequences and implications of induction during preclinical and clinical development. 2. It is becoming increasingly routine to employ hepatocyte cultures and novel techniques such as quantitative real-time reverse transcriptase PCR to identify enzyme inducers in vitro. The major challenge is to utilize these in vitro data to predict the consequences of induction in vivo. From an understanding of pharmacokinetic principles and low clinical doses relative to preclinical studies, there is limited potential for induction by a development candidate to significantly alter the pharmacological efficacy of a coadministered drug. 3. The most comprehensive approach when considering induction involves integrating quantitative in vitro data, information on the pharmacokinetic behaviour of the compound and the PK/PD relationship in order to predict its consequences. The generation of this holistic strategy would enable more detailed and informed decisionmaking about both the suitability of molecules for development and the development strategy itself.
引用
收藏
页码:539 / 556
页数:18
相关论文
共 70 条
  • [1] The relationship among microsomal enzyme induction, liver weight and histological change in rat toxicology studies
    Amacher, DE
    Schomaker, SJ
    Burkhardt, JE
    [J]. FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY, 1998, 36 (9-10) : 831 - 839
  • [2] EFFECT OF OMEPRAZOLE TREATMENT ON DIAZEPAM PLASMA-LEVELS IN SLOW VERSUS NORMAL RAPID METABOLIZERS OF OMEPRAZOLE
    ANDERSSON, T
    CEDERBERG, C
    EDVARDSSON, G
    HEGGELUND, A
    LUNDBORG, P
    [J]. CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 1990, 47 (01) : 79 - 85
  • [3] Concentrations and effects of oral midazolam are greatly reduced in patients treated with carbamazepine or phenytoin
    Backman, JT
    Olkkola, KT
    Ojala, M
    Laaksovirta, H
    Neuvonen, PJ
    [J]. EPILEPSIA, 1996, 37 (03) : 253 - 257
  • [4] The effects of rifampin and rifabutin on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a combination oral contraceptive
    Barditch-Crovo, P
    Trapnell, CB
    Ette, E
    Zacur, HA
    Coresh, J
    Rocco, LE
    Hendrix, CW
    Flexner, C
    [J]. CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 1999, 65 (04) : 428 - 438
  • [5] INDUCTION OF CYTOCHROME-P-450 IN CULTURED RAT HEPATOCYTES - THE HETEROGENEOUS LOCALIZATION OF SPECIFIC ISOENZYMES USING IMMUNOCYTOCHEMISTRY
    BARS, RG
    MITCHELL, AM
    WOLF, CR
    ELCOMBE, CR
    [J]. BIOCHEMICAL JOURNAL, 1989, 262 (01) : 151 - 158
  • [6] Barwick JL, 1996, MOL PHARMACOL, V50, P10
  • [7] INDUCTION OF DRUG-METABOLIZING-ENZYMES BY XENOBIOTICS
    BOCK, KW
    LIPP, HP
    BOCKHENNIG, BS
    [J]. XENOBIOTICA, 1990, 20 (11) : 1101 - 1111
  • [8] Bowen WP, 2000, DRUG METAB DISPOS, V28, P781
  • [9] Do peroxisome proliferating compounds pose a hepatocarcinogenic hazard to humans?
    Cattley, RC
    DeLuca, J
    Elcombe, C
    Fenner-Crisp, P
    Lake, BG
    Marsman, DS
    Pastoor, TA
    Popp, JA
    Robinson, DE
    Schwetz, B
    Tugwood, J
    Wahli, W
    [J]. REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 1998, 27 (01) : 47 - 60
  • [10] Crespi CL, 1998, MED CHEM RES, V8, P457