Time-lapse KIDScoreD5 for prediction of embryo pregnancy potential in fresh and vitrified-warmed single-embryo transfers

被引:6
作者
Tartia, Alina P. [1 ]
Wu, Clara Q. [1 ,2 ]
Gale, Jenna [1 ,2 ]
Shmorgun, Doron [1 ,2 ]
Leveille, Marie-Claude [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Ottawa Fertil Ctr, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Ottawa, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Reprod Med, Ottawa, ON, Canada
关键词
Blastocyst; Gardner score; KIDScore; Morphokinetics; Prediction model; Time-lapse; ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE; BLASTOCYST TRANSFER; SCORING SYSTEM; LIVE BIRTH; IMPLANTATION; MORPHOKINETICS; SELECTION; MODEL; RATES;
D O I
10.1016/j.rbmo.2022.03.019
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Research question: Can KIDScoreD5 predict which blastocysts have the highest potential for achieving pregnancy? Design: A retrospective cohort study of 670 single fresh or frozen (FET) embryo transfer cycles was conducted between May 2019 and June 2021 at the Ottawa Fertility Centre, Canada. Blastocysts obtained from stimulated eligible cycles and cultured in a time-lapse incubator were selected for transfer or cryopreservation based on Gardner morphological scoring. Implantation and viable pregnancy rates were analysed retrospectively using KIDScoreD5 and Gardner scores associated with the transferred embryos. The predictive power of the KIDScoreD5 and Gardner assessment was evaluated using the average area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve. Results: KIDScoreD5 was positively correlated with implantation (r = 0.96, P = 0.002) and viable pregnancy (r = 0.96, P = 0.0001) rates. In fresh embryo transfer cycles, the AUC for implantation rate was significantly higher for KIDScoreD5 compared with Gardner scoring (0.70 versus 0.63, P = 0.03). For FET, significantly higher AUC were calculated for KIDScoreD5 than for Gardner scoring, for both implantation (0.64 versus 0.54, P = 0.002) and viable pregnancy (0.63 versus 0.53, P = 0.002) rates. When the ranking of cryopreserved embryos was based on KIDScoreD5, 46.2% of the FET cycles had at least one unused sibling embryo with a better KIDScoreD5 than the one selected for FET based on Gardner assessment. Conclusions: KIDScoreD5 predicts implantation and viable pregnancy rates of blastocysts better than Gardner morphological assessment in single fresh or cryopreserved embryo transfer cycles.
引用
收藏
页码:46 / 53
页数:8
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] Improved implantation rates of day 3 embryo transfers with the use of an automated time-lapse-enabled test to aid in embryo selection
    Adamson, G. David
    Abusief, Mary E.
    Palao, Lourella
    Witmer, Jennifer
    Palao, Lonyl M.
    Gvakharia, Marina
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2016, 105 (02) : 369 - +
  • [2] Adashi Eli Y, 2003, Reprod Biomed Online, V7, P515
  • [3] External validation of a time-lapse model; a retrospective study comparing embryo evaluation using a morphokinetic model to standard morphology with live birth as endpoint
    Adolfsson, Emma
    Porath, Sandra
    Andershed, Anna Nowosad
    [J]. JORNAL BRASILEIRO DE REPRODUCAO ASSISTIDA, 2018, 22 (03): : 205 - 214
  • [4] Trophectoderm morphology: an important parameter for predicting live birth after single blastocyst transfer
    Ahlstrom, A.
    Westin, C.
    Reismer, E.
    Wikland, M.
    Hardarson, T.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2011, 26 (12) : 3289 - 3296
  • [5] Assessment of embryo implantation potential with a cloud-based automatic software
    Alegre, Lucia
    Del Gallego, Raquel
    Bori, Lorena
    Loewke, Kevin
    Maddah, Mahnaz
    Aparicio-Ruiz, Belen
    Palma-Govea, Ana Paula
    Marcos, Julian
    Meseguer, Marcos
    [J]. REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2021, 42 (01) : 66 - 74
  • [6] Good practice recommendations for the use of time-lapse technology
    Apter, Susanna
    Ebner, Thomas
    Freour, Thomas
    Guns, Yves
    Kovacic, Borut
    Le Clef, Nathalie
    Marques, Monica
    Meseguer, Marcos
    Montjean, Debbie
    Sfontouris, Ioannis
    Sturmey, Roger
    Coticchio, Giovanni
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION OPEN, 2020, 2020 (02)
  • [7] What does morphokinetics add to embryo selection and in-vitro fertilization outcomes?
    Basile, Natalia
    Caiazzo, Mauro
    Meseguer, Marcos
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 27 (03) : 193 - 200
  • [8] Predicting pregnancy test results after embryo transfer by image feature extraction and analysis using machine learning
    Chavez-Badiola, Alejandro
    Flores-Saiffe Farias, Adolfo
    Mendizabal-Ruiz, Gerardo
    Garcia-Sanchez, Rodolfo
    Drakeley, Andrew J.
    Garcia-Sandoval, Juan Paulo
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)
  • [9] Embryo quality, blastocyst and ongoing pregnancy rates in oocyte donation patients whose embryos were monitored by time-lapse imaging
    Cruz, Maria
    Gadea, Blanca
    Garrido, Nicolas
    Pedersen, Kamilla Soe
    Martinez, Mar
    Perez-Cano, Inma
    Munoz, Manuel
    Meseguer, Marcos
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2011, 28 (07) : 569 - 573
  • [10] Analysis of embryo morphokinetics, multinucleation and cleavage anomalies using continuous time-lapse monitoring in blastocyst transfer cycles
    Desai, Nina
    Ploskonka, Stephanie
    Goodman, Linnea R.
    Austin, Cynthia
    Goldberg, Jeffrey
    Falcone, Tommaso
    [J]. REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY AND ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2014, 12