Reviewing the use and quality of machine learning in developing clinical prediction models for cardiovascular disease

被引:8
作者
Allan, Simon [1 ]
Olaiya, Raphael [2 ]
Burhan, Rasan [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Manchester Med Sch, Manchester, Lancs, England
[2] UCL, UCL Ctr Artificial Intelligence, London, England
[3] St Georges Healthcare NHS Trust, London, England
关键词
cardiology; epidemiology; general medicine (see Internal Medicine); public health; statistics & research methods; RISK PREDICTION; RANDOM FORESTS; REGRESSION;
D O I
10.1136/postgradmedj-2020-139352
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is one of the leading causes of death across the world. CVD can lead to angina, heart attacks, heart failure, strokes, and eventually, death; among many other serious conditions. The early intervention with those at a higher risk of developing CVD, typically with statin treatment, leads to better health outcomes. For this reason, clinical prediction models (CPMs) have been developed to identify those at a high risk of developing CVD so that treatment can begin at an earlier stage. Currently, CPMs are built around statistical analysis of factors linked to developing CVD, such as body mass index and family history. The emerging field of machine learning (ML) in healthcare, using computer algorithms that learn from a dataset without explicit programming, has the potential to outperform the CPMs available today. ML has already shown exciting progress in the detection of skin malignancies, bone fractures and many other medical conditions. In this review, we will analyse and explain the CPMs currently in use with comparisons to their developing ML counterparts. We have found that although the newest non-ML CPMs are effective, ML-based approaches consistently outperform them. However, improvements to the literature need to be made before ML should be implemented over current CPMs.
引用
收藏
页码:551 / 558
页数:8
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] Aggarwal Rakesh, 2017, Perspect Clin Res, V8, P100, DOI 10.4103/2229-3485.203040
  • [2] Cardiovascular disease risk prediction using automated machine learning: A prospective study of 423,604 UK Biobank participants
    Alaa, Ahmed M.
    Bolton, Thomas
    Di Angelantonio, Emanuele
    Rudd, James H. F.
    van der Schaar, Mihaela
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (05):
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2018, Surveillance report 2018 - Dental checks: intervals between oral health reviews (2004) NICE guideline CG19
  • [4] Armitage P., 2002, STAT METHODS MEDICAL, P583
  • [5] Clinical prediction models: a fashion or a necessity in medicine?
    Bernard, Alain
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2017, 9 (10) : 3456 - 3457
  • [6] Statistics review 7: Correlation and regression
    Bewick, V
    Cheek, L
    Ball, J
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE, 2003, 7 (06): : 451 - 459
  • [7] Trends in the epidemiology of cardiovascular disease in the UK
    Bhatnagar, Prachi
    Wickramasinghe, Kremlin
    Wilkins, Elizabeth
    Townsend, Nick
    [J]. HEART, 2016, 102 (24) : 1945 - 1952
  • [8] BHF, 2019, HEART CIRC DIS STAT
  • [9] Bosomworth NJ, 2011, CAN FAM PHYSICIAN, V57, P417
  • [10] Random forests
    Breiman, L
    [J]. MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) : 5 - 32