Using a choice modelling approach for customer service standards in urban water

被引:15
作者
MacDonald, DH
Barnes, M
Bennett, J
Morrison, M
Young, MD
机构
[1] CSIRO, Land & Water, Policy & Econ Res Unit, Glen Osmond, SA 5064, Australia
[2] CSIRO, Math & Informat Sci, Glen Osmond, SA 5064, Australia
[3] Australian Natl Univ, Natl Ctr Dev Studies, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia
[4] Charles Sturt Univ, Sch Mkt & Management, Bathurst, NSW 2795, Australia
来源
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION | 2005年 / 41卷 / 03期
关键词
economics; choice modeling; water policy; urban water management; reliability of water supply; customer service standards; water decision making;
D O I
10.1111/j.1752-1688.2005.tb03766.x
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
A series of reforms in the water industry in Australia has created a demand from the industry and regulators for objective methodologies to evaluate incremental changes in the customer service standards. In this paper, the use of choice modeling for estimating implicit prices associated with urban water supply attributes is explored. Results from multinomial logit (MNL) and random parameters logit (RPL) models show that increases in annual water bills and the frequency of future interruptions were the most important attributes. Implicit price confidence intervals based on the best models suggest that people are willing to pay positive amounts to achieve a water supply that is less frequently interrupted. The provision of alternative water supplies during an interruption and notification of the interruption were found to be unimportant to respondents. Choice modeling proved to be a useful technique and provided the industry and regulators with additional information for standard setting.
引用
收藏
页码:719 / 728
页数:10
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
*ALL CONS GROUP, 2001, 17 IPART ALL CONS GR
[2]  
*AUSTR GOV DEP AGR, 1994, WAT REF FRAM
[3]  
Ben-Akiva M., 1985, Discrete choice analysis: theory and application to travel demand
[4]  
Bennett J, 2001, NEW HOR ENV ECO, P37
[5]   A comparison of stated preference methods for environmental valuation [J].
Boxall, PC ;
Adamowicz, WL ;
Swait, J ;
Williams, M ;
Louviere, J .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 1996, 18 (03) :243-253
[6]   Discrete choice modelling for transportation [J].
Brownstone, D .
TRAVEL BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH: THE LEADING EDGE, 2001, :97-124
[7]  
BURN LS, 2001, ROLE PLANNING MODELS, V11, P279
[8]  
CONSTANTINE AG, 1996, WATER J AUSTR WATER, V23, P9
[9]  
Goett AA, 2000, ENERGY J, V21, P1
[10]  
Gordon J, 2001, NEW HOR ENV ECO, P73