Knowledge and attitudes are important factors in farmers' choice of lamb tail docking length

被引:7
作者
Woodruff, M. E. [1 ]
Doyle, R. [1 ]
Coleman, G. [1 ]
Hemsworth, L. [1 ]
Munoz, C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Anim Welf Sci Ctr, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
husbandry; interviews; sheep; surveys; theory of planned behaviour;
D O I
10.1136/vr.105631
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
Background Tail docking is common practice in the sheep industry to prevent soiling of the breech and flystrike. To ensure optimal healing after tail docking and reduce the risk of arthritis, perineal cancers and prolapses, it is recommended to dock tails equivalent to the length of the vulva. However, recent studies have found that some tails are docked too short (24-86 per cent). Methods To address this issue, this study aimed to identify key drivers behind tail docking length decisions. Two focus groups, phone (n=30) and online surveys (n=21) were conducted in regional Victoria, Australia to examine farmer knowledge of and attitudes towards appropriate lamb tail length and barriers to best practice. The focus group data were analysed qualitatively, and the surveys were analysed qualitatively and quantitatively. Results In total, 57 per cent of farmers were classed as docking tails short. Short tail docking appeared to be influenced by unawareness of the recommended length and docking at a length that shearers approve of. Other potential factors included lack of knowledge of negative health consequences associated with short tails, importance placed on dag and flystrike prevention, and impracticality of measuring where to dock. Conclusion Addressing these factors in future education and intervention programmes may improve tail docking practice and sheep welfare. © © British Veterinary Association 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
引用
收藏
页码:319 / 319
页数:1
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [11] LAMB TAIL DOCKING - A CONTROLLED FIELD-STUDY OF THE EFFECTS OF TAIL AMPUTATION ON HEALTH AND PRODUCTIVITY
    FRENCH, NP
    WALL, R
    MORGAN, KL
    [J]. VETERINARY RECORD, 1994, 134 (18) : 463 - 467
  • [12] Farmers' attitudes to disease risk management in England: A comparative analysis of sheep and pig farmers
    Garforth, C. J.
    Bailey, A. P.
    Tranter, R. B.
    [J]. PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 2013, 110 (3-4) : 456 - 466
  • [13] Gill D. A., 1939, Journal of the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research, Australia, V12, P71
  • [14] Goodwin J, 2007, J EXT, V45
  • [15] Graham N. P. H., 1947, AUSTRALIAN VTT JOUR, V23, P31, DOI 10.1111/j.1751-0813.1947.tb04510.x
  • [16] Graham N. P. H., 1947, AUSTRALIAN VET JOUR, V23, P59, DOI 10.1111/j.1751-0813.1947.tb04518.x
  • [17] Hemsworth PH, 2011, HUMAN-LIVESTOCK INTERACTIONS, 2ND EDITION: THE STOCKPERSON AND THE PRODUCTIVITY AND WELFARE OF INTENSIVELY FARMED ANIMALS, P1, DOI 10.1079/9781845936730.0000
  • [18] Hemsworth PH, 2002, J ANIM SCI, V80, P68
  • [19] IMPROVING THE ATTITUDE AND BEHAVIOR OF STOCKPERSONS TOWARDS PIGS AND THE CONSEQUENCES ON THE BEHAVIOR AND REPRODUCTIVE-PERFORMANCE OF COMMERCIAL PIGS
    HEMSWORTH, PH
    COLEMAN, GJ
    BARNETT, JL
    [J]. APPLIED ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR SCIENCE, 1994, 39 (3-4) : 349 - 362
  • [20] Howard K, 2018, A national producer survey of sheep husbandry practices