Implementing the additional strength biowaiver for generics: EMA recommended approaches and challenges for a US-FDA submission

被引:5
作者
Cardot, J. -M. [1 ]
Garcia-Arieta, A. [2 ]
Paixao, P. [3 ]
Tasevska, I. [4 ]
Davit, B. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Clermont Auvergne, MEDIS, Fac Pharm, Lab Biopharm, 28 Pl H Dunant, F-63001 Clermont Ferrand, France
[2] AEMPS, Pharmacokinet & Gener Med, Div Pharmacol & Clin Evaluat, Dept Human Use Med, Calle Campezo 1 Edificio 8, Madrid 28022, Spain
[3] INFARMED Natl Author Med & Hlth Prod, Ave Brasil 53, P-1749004 Lisbon, Portugal
[4] State Inst Drug Control SUKL, Srobarova 48, Prague 10041 10, Czech Republic
[5] Translat Med Merck & Co, 2000 Galloping Hill Rd, Kenilworth, NJ 07033 USA
关键词
Strength; Biowaiver; EMA; US-FDA; MULTIVARIATE STATISTICAL DISTANCE; RELEASE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejps.2017.10.013
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
This review describes the EMA requirements on biowaivers for additional strengths of immediate release and modified release oral solid dosage forms focused on generic applications and highlights the challenges for a simultaneous EMA and FDA submission. Some specificities of the current EMA guidelines are compared with the current FDA Guidance for Industry, with a special focus on the strength to be investigated in vivo, formulation suitability for biowaiver, and optimizing dissolution studies for additional strength biowaivers. In Europe, the same principles applied for generics may be considered for deriving the biowaivers for innovator products. Several case studies are presented to illustrate the challenges of applying for additional strength biowaivers in EMA and FDA simultaneously.
引用
收藏
页码:399 / 408
页数:10
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Implementing the Biopharmaceutics Classification System in Drug Development: Reconciling Similarities, Differences, and Shared Challenges in the EMA and US-FDA-Recommended Approaches [J].
Cardot, J. -M. ;
Garcia Arieta, A. ;
Paixao, P. ;
Tasevska, I. ;
Davit, B. .
AAPS JOURNAL, 2016, 18 (04) :1039-1046
[2]   Dissolution comparisons using a Multivariate Statistical Distance (MSD) test and a comparison of various approaches for calculating the measurements of dissolution profile comparison [J].
Cardot, J-M. ;
Roudier, B. ;
Schuetz, H. .
AAPS JOURNAL, 2017, 19 (04) :1091-1101
[3]  
CHMP, 2015, QUEST ANSW POS SPEC
[4]  
European Medicines Agency, 2010, CPMP/EWP/QWP/1401/ 98
[5]  
European Medicines Agency, 2014, EMACHMPEWP28096
[6]   Global Harmonization of Comparator Products for Bioequivalence Studies [J].
Gwaza, Luther ;
Gordon, John ;
Leufkens, Hubert ;
Stahl, Matthias ;
Garcia-Arieta, Alfredo .
AAPS JOURNAL, 2017, 19 (03) :603-606
[7]   Influence of Drug Properties and Formulation on In Vitro Drug Release and Biowaiver Regulation of Oral Extended Release Dosage Forms [J].
Lin, Zhongqiang ;
Zhou, Deliang ;
Hoag, Stephen ;
Qiu, Yihong .
AAPS JOURNAL, 2016, 18 (02) :333-345
[8]   Assessment of the Regulatory Methods for the Comparison of Highly Variable Dissolution Profiles [J].
Mangas-Sanjuan, Victor ;
Colon-Useche, Sarin ;
Gonzalez-Alvarez, Isabel ;
Bermejo, Marival ;
Garcia-Arieta, Alfredo .
AAPS JOURNAL, 2016, 18 (06) :1550-1561
[9]   Evaluation of dissolution profile similarity - Comparison between the f2, the multivariate statistical distance and the f2 bootstrapping methods [J].
Paixao, Paulo ;
Gouveia, Luis F. ;
Silva, Nuno ;
Morais, Jose A. G. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS AND BIOPHARMACEUTICS, 2017, 112 :67-74
[10]   An alternative single dose parameter to avoid the need for steady-state studies on oral extended-release drug products [J].
Paixao, Paulo ;
Gouveia, Luis F. ;
Morais, Jose A. G. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS AND BIOPHARMACEUTICS, 2012, 80 (02) :410-417