The public health impacts of a fat tax

被引:56
作者
Tiffin, R. [1 ]
Arnoult, M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Reading, Dept Agr & Food Econ, Reading RG6 6AR, Berks, England
[2] Scottish Agr Coll, Land Econ & Environm Res Grp, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
关键词
nutrition policy; models; economic; fat tax; TARGETED FOOD TAXES; VEGETABLE INTAKE; DEMAND; FRUIT; DIET; PREVALENCE; POLICY; RISK;
D O I
10.1038/ejcn.2010.281
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 ;
摘要
Background/Objectives: Previous studies have analysed impacts on average intakes. Agueably however intakes that are of real concern are those which are some distance away from the recommendations. Fiscal measures might have a limited impact on such diets, and as a result, on health. We measure the impact of a fiscal intervention on the the risks of diet-related disease, accounting for the full range of diets. Subjects/Methods: Demand equations are estimated with data collected from 6760 households in the UK Expenditure and Food Survey. The model is used to simulate the impacts of a policy, in which a tax based on saturated fat content is combined with subsidy on fruit and vegetables. Changes in consumption are used to compute the effects on the risks of a range of diet-related disease using measures of relative risk. In contrast with other studies, we simulate the impacts of the fiscal regime at the level of the individual households in the sample. Results: The subsidy brings mean levels of fruit and vegetable consumption in line with dietary recommendations, but the tax is insufficient to achieve this goal for fat intakes. Once the changes in diet are converted into changes in the risks of disease, the impacts of the policy are negligible. A substantial part of the population continues to consume an unhealthy diet. Conclusion: Fiscally based interventions should be considered amongst a suite of policy interventions, which also include policies aimed at improving the poorest of diets. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition (2011) 65, 427-433; doi:10.1038/ejcn.2010.281; published online 19 January 2011
引用
收藏
页码:427 / 433
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
[11]  
Food Standards Agency, 2007, LOW INC DIET NUTR SU
[12]   Evaluation of a multiple ecological level child obesity prevention program: Switch® what you Do, View, and Chew [J].
Gentile, Douglas A. ;
Welk, Greg ;
Eisenmann, Joey C. ;
Reimer, Rachel A. ;
Walsh, David A. ;
Russell, Daniel W. ;
Callahan, Randi ;
Walsh, Monica ;
Strickland, Sarah ;
Fritz, Katie .
BMC MEDICINE, 2009, 7 :49
[13]   Fruit and vegetable intake and risk of major chronic disease [J].
Hung, HC ;
Joshipura, KJ ;
Jiang, R ;
Hu, FB ;
Hunter, D ;
Smith-Warner, SA ;
Colditz, GA ;
Rosner, B ;
Spiegelman, D ;
Willett, WC .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2004, 96 (21) :1577-1584
[14]   Cost-effective design of economic instruments in nutrition policy [J].
Jensen, Jorgen D. ;
Smed, Sinne .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL NUTRITION AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY, 2007, 4 (1)
[15]   The effect of fruit and vegetable intake on risk for coronary heart disease [J].
Joshipura, KJ ;
Hu, FB ;
Manson, JE ;
Stampfer, MJ ;
Rimm, EB ;
Speizer, FE ;
Colditz, G ;
Ascherio, A ;
Rosner, B ;
Spiegelman, D ;
Willett, WC .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2001, 134 (12) :1106-1114
[16]  
Kennedy E, 2000, BRIT MED J, V320, P304
[17]   Taxing snack foods: Manipulating diet quality or financing information programs? [J].
Kuchler, F ;
Tegene, A ;
Harris, JM .
REVIEW OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2005, 27 (01) :4-20
[18]   The role of public policies in reducing smoking prevalence in California:: Results from the California Tobacco Policy Simulation Model [J].
Levy, David T. ;
Hyland, Andrew ;
Higbee, Cheryl ;
Remer, Lillian ;
Compton, Christine .
HEALTH POLICY, 2007, 82 (02) :167-185
[19]   Exploring a fiscal food policy: the case of diet and ischaemic heart disease [J].
Marshall, T .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 320 (7230) :301-304
[20]   Could targeted food taxes improve health? [J].
Mytton, Oliver ;
Gray, Alastair ;
Rayner, Mike ;
Rutter, Harry .
JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2007, 61 (08) :689-694