Quantiles as optimal point forecasts

被引:147
作者
Gneiting, Tilmann [1 ]
机构
[1] Heidelberg Univ, Inst Angewandte Math, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Decision making; Density forecasts; Incentive-compatible compensation scheme; Loss function; Piecewise linear; Proper scoring rule; Quantile; PROPER SCORING RULES; PROBABILISTIC FORECASTS; OPTIMAL PREDICTION; DENSITY FORECASTS; ASYMMETRIC LOSS; ELICITATION; REGRESSION; COST;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijforecast.2009.12.015
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Loss functions play a central role in the theory and practice of forecasting. If the loss function is quadratic, the mean of the predictive distribution is the unique optimal point predictor. If the loss is symmetric piecewise linear, any median is an optimal point forecast. Quantiles arise as optimal point forecasts under a general class of economically relevant loss functions, which nests the asymmetric piecewise linear loss, and which we refer to as generalized piecewise linear (GPL). The level of the quantile depends on a generic asymmetry parameter which reflects the possibly distinct costs of underprediction and overprediction. Conversely, a loss function for which quantiles are optimal point forecasts is necessarily GPL. We review characterizations of this type in the work of Thomson, Saerens and Komunjer, and relate to proper scoring rules, incentive-compatible compensation schemes and quantile regression. In the empirical part of the paper, the relevance of decision theoretic guidance in the transition from a predictive distribution to a point forecast is illustrated using the Bank of England's density forecasts of United Kingdom inflation rates, and probabilistic predictions of wind energy resources in the Pacific Northwest. (C) 2010 International Institute of Forecasters. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:197 / 207
页数:11
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1961, Applied Statistical Decision Theory
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1967, Mathematical Statistics: A Decision Theoretic Approach
[3]   On the optimality of conditional expectation as a Bregman predictor [J].
Banerjee, A ;
Guo, X ;
Wang, H .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION THEORY, 2005, 51 (07) :2664-2669
[4]   Loss function assumptions in rational expectations tests on financial analysts' earnings forecasts [J].
Basu, S ;
Markov, S .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 2004, 38 (1-3) :171-203
[5]   BAYESIAN POINT ESTIMATION AND PREDICTION [J].
BRITNEY, RR ;
WINKLER, RL .
ANNALS OF THE INSTITUTE OF STATISTICAL MATHEMATICS, 1974, 26 (01) :15-34
[6]   Weather forecasting for weather derivatives [J].
Campbell, SD ;
Diebold, FX .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2005, 100 (469) :6-16
[7]  
Cervera J. L., 1996, Bayesian Statistics, P513, DOI DOI 10.1093/OSO/9780198523567.003.0029
[8]   Financial asset returns, direction-of-change forecasting, and volatility dynamics [J].
Christoffersen, Peter F. ;
Diebold, Francis X. .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2006, 52 (08) :1273-1287
[9]   Optimal prediction under asymmetric loss [J].
Christoffersen, PF ;
Diebold, FX .
ECONOMETRIC THEORY, 1997, 13 (06) :808-817
[10]  
Christoffersen PF, 1996, J APPL ECONOM, V11, P561, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1255(199609)11:5<561::AID-JAE406>3.3.CO