Analysis and comparison of extremum seeking control techniques

被引：25

作者：

Lalla, Carlos ^{[1
]}

Isabel, Maria ^{[1
]}

Leyva, Arteaga Ramon ^{[1
]}

El Aroudi, Abdelali ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Rovira & Virgili, Dept Eng Elect Elect & Automat, Tarragona, Spain

来源：

2007 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS, PROCEEDINGS, VOLS 1-8 | 2007年

关键词：

D O I：

10.1109/ISIE.2007.4374576

中图分类号：

TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];

学科分类号：

0812 ;

摘要：

Two non-perturvative extremum seeking control approaches are analyzed; the first approach needs the sensing of the function's gradient while the second one does not. Relationships between the algorithms parameters and their dynamic behavior are found. Also expressions for the steady state error of both approaches are derived. Finally, these results are used to verify and to compare, by means of simulation, the performance of both methods.

引用

页码：72 / 76

页数：5

共 8 条

[1]

ABATUT JL, 1965, THESIS U TOUOLOUSE

[2]

Korovin S. K., 1972, AUTOMAT REM CONTR, P50

[3] USING SLIDING MODES IN STATIC OPTIMIZATION AND NONLINEAR-PROGRAMMING [J].

KOROVIN, SK ;

UTKIN, VI .

AUTOMATICA, 1974, 10 (05) :525-532

[4]

KRSTIC M, 2003, REAL TIME OPTIMZATIO

[5]

KRSTIC M, 1997, DEC CONTR P 36 IEEE

[6]

Leblanc M., 1922, Rev. Generale L'Electricite, V12, P275

[7] MPPT of photovoltaic systems using extremum-seeking control [J].

Leyva, R ;

Alonso, C ;

Queinnec, I ;

Cid-Pastor, A ;

Lagrange, D ;

Martínez-Salamero, L .

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AEROSPACE AND ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS, 2006, 42 (01) :249-258

[8]

MOROSANOV IS, 1957, AUTOMAT REM CONTR, V18, P1077

← 1 →