Optimal planning of phase II/III programs for clinical trials with multiple endpoints

被引:3
作者
Kieser, Meinhard [1 ]
Kirchner, Marietta [1 ]
Doelger, Eva [1 ]
Goette, Heiko [2 ]
机构
[1] Heidelberg Univ, Inst Med Biometry & Informat, Neuenheimer Feld 130-3, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
[2] Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
关键词
drug development program; multiple endpoints; phase II; III; probability of success; sample size; SAMPLE-SIZE; PROGRESSION-FREE; PROBABILITY; SUCCESS; DECISIONS; ASSURANCE; SURVIVAL; OUTCOMES; DESIGNS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1002/pst.1861
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Owing to increased costs and competition pressure, drug development becomes more and more challenging. Therefore, there is a strong need for improving efficiency of clinical research by developing and applying methods for quantitative decision making. In this context, the integrated planning for phase II/III programs plays an important role as numerous quantities can be varied that are crucial for cost, benefit, and program success. Recently, a utility-based framework has been proposed for an optimal planning of phase II/III programs that puts the choice of decision boundaries and phase II sample sizes on a quantitative basis. However, this method is restricted to studies with a single time-to-event endpoint. We generalize this procedure to the setting of clinical trials with multiple endpoints and (asymptotically) normally distributed test statistics. Optimal phase II sample sizes and go/no-go decision rules are provided for both the all-or-none and at-least-one win criteria. Application of the proposed method is illustrated by drug development programs in the fields of Alzheimer disease and oncology.
引用
收藏
页码:437 / 457
页数:21
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]   Poor correlation between progression-free and overall survival in modern clinical trials: Are composite endpoints the answer? [J].
Amir, Eitan ;
Seruga, Bostjan ;
Kwong, Ryan ;
Tannock, Ian F. ;
Ocana, Alberto .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2012, 48 (03) :385-388
[2]  
[Anonymous], GUID EV ANT MED PROD
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2013, GUID IND ALZH DIS DE
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1995, Biometrie in der Chemisch-Pharmazeutischen Industrie
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2012, GUID IND IRR BOW SYN
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2015, COCHRANE DATABASE SY
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2007, GUID IND CLIN TRIAL
[8]   Optimizing Drug Development Programs: Type 2 Diabetes Case Study [J].
Antonijevic, Zoran ;
Kimber, Martin ;
Manner, David ;
Burman, Carl-Fredrik ;
Pinheiro, Jose ;
Bergenheim, Klas .
THERAPEUTIC INNOVATION & REGULATORY SCIENCE, 2013, 47 (03) :363-374
[9]   Impact of Dose Selection Strategies Used in Phase II on the Probability of Success in Phase III [J].
Antonijevic, Zoran ;
Pinheiro, Jose ;
Fardipour, Parvin ;
Lewis, Roger J. .
STATISTICS IN BIOPHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH, 2010, 2 (04) :469-486
[10]   Adaptive two-stage designs in phase II clinical trials [J].
Banerjee, Anindita ;
Tsiatis, Anastasios A. .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2006, 25 (19) :3382-3395