Core behavior and low-cycle fatigue estimation of the Perforated Core Buckling-Restrained Brace

被引:20
作者
Cahis, X. [1 ]
Simon, E. [1 ]
Piedrafita, D. [1 ]
Catalan, A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Girona, Dept Mech & Construct Engn, Girona, Spain
[2] Univ Oviedo, Dept Construct, Gijon, Spain
关键词
Buckling-restrained brace; Hysteresis damper; Energy dissipation; Low-cycle fatigue; High-mode buckling; Buckling wavelength; DAMAGE MODEL; STEEL; TESTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.07.044
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The Perforated Core Buckling-Restrained Brace (PCBRB) is an all-steel BRB whose core has been split into two lateral bands connected by stabilizing bridges. The core, with a constant cross-section perimeter, can slide along the restrainer so that it can be inspected or replaced by simply removing a centering pin. We analyzed the behavior of two different Perforated Core (PC) geometries which we tested to failure with different load protocols of several maximum deformation amplitudes. The main difference between both geometries was the radius of the lateral band connections. The experimental results show how a low radius, despite offering a higher constant cross-section yielding length, leads to a lower dissipation capacity and to a closer distance between stabilizing bridges. The results also show a gradual drift of the internal and the external lateral band segments into permanent negative and positive elongations, respectively, which increases the minimum gap required between the core and the restrainer. We also analyzed the in-plane and the out-of-plane wavelength of the high mode buckling of the PC and validated two wavelength prediction equations that would prevent the uncontrolled second-order deformations and the buckling failure of the PC. Finally, based on experimental data, we propose two low-cycle fatigue relationships for the PCBRB that would be valid for elastoplastic devices with uniform uniaxial strain distribution, such as BRBs and TADAS devices.
引用
收藏
页码:126 / 138
页数:13
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
American Institute of Steel Construction, 2016, 34116 ANSIAISC, P430
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1988, P 9 WORLD C EARTHQ E
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2016, 689212016 CEN EC S B, DOI [10.3403/30268532, DOI 10.3403/30268532]
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2009, EN 13263-1:2005+A1
[5]  
ANSYS Inc, 2017, ANSYS AC RES
[6]   An energy-based damage model for seismic response of steel structures [J].
Benavent-Climent, A. .
EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2007, 36 (08) :1049-1064
[7]   A brace-type seismic damper based on yielding the walls of hollow structural sections [J].
Benavent-Climent, Amadeo .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2010, 32 (04) :1113-1122
[8]  
Black C, 2002, 200208 PEER, P115
[9]   Component testing, seismic evaluation and characterization of buckling-restrained braces [J].
Black, CJ ;
Makris, N ;
Aiken, ID .
JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2004, 130 (06) :880-894
[10]   Failure criteria and cumulative damage models for steel components under cyclic loading [J].
Castiglioni, Carlo A. ;
Pucinotti, Raffaele .
JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTIONAL STEEL RESEARCH, 2009, 65 (04) :751-765