Moderated Online Data-Collection for Developmental Research: Methods and Replications

被引:33
作者
Chuey, Aaron [1 ]
Asaba, Mika [1 ]
Bridgers, Sophie [2 ]
Carrillo, Brandon [1 ]
Dietz, Griffin [1 ]
Garcia, Teresa [1 ]
Leonard, Julia A. [3 ]
Liu, Shari [2 ]
Merrick, Megan [4 ]
Radwan, Samaher [1 ]
Stegall, Jessa [1 ]
Velez, Natalia [5 ]
Woo, Brandon [5 ]
Wu, Yang [1 ]
Zhou, Xi J. [1 ]
Frank, Michael C. [1 ]
Gweon, Hyowon [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Psychol, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA
[2] MIT, Dept Brain & Cognit Sci, E25-618, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[3] Yale Univ, Dept Psychol, New Haven, CT USA
[4] Indiana Univ, Dept Psychol & Brain Sci, Bloomington, IN USA
[5] Harvard Univ, Dept Psychol, 33 Kirkland St, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY | 2021年 / 12卷
关键词
online research; cognitive development; meta-analysis; replication; moderated data collection; SCIENCE;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2021.734398
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Online data collection methods are expanding the ease and access of developmental research for researchers and participants alike. While its popularity among developmental scientists has soared during the COVID-19 pandemic, its potential goes beyond just a means for safe, socially distanced data collection. In particular, advances in video conferencing software has enabled researchers to engage in face-to-face interactions with participants from nearly any location at any time. Due to the novelty of these methods, however, many researchers still remain uncertain about the differences in available approaches as well as the validity of online methods more broadly. In this article, we aim to address both issues with a focus on moderated (synchronous) data collected using video-conferencing software (e.g., Zoom). First, we review existing approaches for designing and executing moderated online studies with young children. We also present concrete examples of studies that implemented choice and verbal measures (Studies 1 and 2) and looking time (Studies 3 and 4) across both in-person and online moderated data collection methods. Direct comparison of the two methods within each study as well as a meta-analysis of all studies suggest that the results from the two methods are comparable, providing empirical support for the validity of moderated online data collection. Finally, we discuss current limitations of online data collection and possible solutions, as well as its potential to increase the accessibility, diversity, and replicability of developmental science.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] The MTurkification of Social and Personality Psychology
    Anderson, Craig A.
    Allen, Johnie J.
    Plante, Courtney
    Quigley-McBride, Adele
    Lovett, Alison
    Rokkum, Jeffrey N.
    [J]. PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 2019, 45 (06) : 842 - 850
  • [2] Asaba M., 2020, PROC ANN M COGNITIVE, P2650
  • [3] What's in a look?
    Aslin, Richard N.
    [J]. DEVELOPMENTAL SCIENCE, 2007, 10 (01) : 48 - 53
  • [4] Bailenson Jeremy N., 2021, Technology, Mind, and Behavior, V1, DOI DOI 10.1037/TMB0000030
  • [5] DOES THE AUTISTIC-CHILD HAVE A THEORY OF MIND
    BARONCOHEN, S
    LESLIE, AM
    FRITH, U
    [J]. COGNITION, 1985, 21 (01) : 37 - 46
  • [6] Casstevens R.M., 2007, jHab: Java habituation software (version 1.0. 2)
  • [7] Del Re A. C., 2012, PACKAGE COMPUTE ES
  • [8] TAKING THE INTENTIONAL STANCE AT 12 MONTHS OF AGE
    GERGELY, G
    NADASDY, Z
    CSIBRA, G
    BIRO, S
    [J]. COGNITION, 1995, 56 (02) : 165 - 193
  • [9] Mini Meta-Analysis of Your Own Studies: Some Arguments on Why and a Primer on How
    Goh, Jin X.
    Hall, Judith A.
    Rosenthal, Robert
    [J]. SOCIAL AND PERSONALITY PSYCHOLOGY COMPASS, 2016, 10 (10): : 535 - 549
  • [10] SIMR: an R package for power analysis of generalized linear mixed models by simulation
    Green, Peter
    MacLeod, Catriona J.
    [J]. METHODS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2016, 7 (04): : 493 - 498