Incidence and Timing of Thrombocytopenia in Patients Receiving Impella Ventricular Assist Device Support

被引:5
|
作者
Shuster, Mareena [1 ]
Konopka, Chelsea, I [1 ]
Verlinden, Nathan J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Allegheny Gen Hosp, Dept Pharm, 320 E North Ave, Pittsburgh, PA 15212 USA
关键词
Impella; cardiogenic shock; ventricular assist device; thrombocytopenia; INTRAAORTIC BALLOON PUMP; MECHANICAL CIRCULATORY SUPPORT; CARDIOGENIC-SHOCK; HEPARIN; TRENDS; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1097/MAT.0000000000001625
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Impella devices are used in patients with cardiogenic shock or during high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention. Although thrombocytopenia is a known complication in patients receiving Impella support, the incidence and timing of thrombocytopenia remain unknown in this patient population. We retrospectively reviewed adult patients with a left-sided Impella device inserted for more than 24 hours between February 2016 and December 2019. A total of 349 patients were reviewed, and 99 patients were included. Baseline characteristics were similar between patients with thrombocytopenia and those without thrombocytopenia with the exception of median duration of Impella support, which was longer in patients with thrombocytopenia (3.7 vs. 2.1 days; p < 0.001). Thrombocytopenia occurred in 70 patients (70.7%) after Impella implantation. Median time to onset of thrombocytopenia after Impella placement was 2 days with platelet nadirs occurring after 4 days. Thrombocytopenia was mild in our study with 73% of patients having platelet nadirs above 50,000/mL. Duration of Impella support (odds ratio [OR] per day: 1.31; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.06-1.56; p = 0.017) and aspirin use (OR: 9.7; 95% CI: 1.46-64.5; p = 0.019) were independent predictors of thrombocytopenia. Thrombocytopenia is common in patients after Impella implantation but is not associated with adverse outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:1135 / 1140
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Hemodynamic Support With a Microaxial Percutaneous Left Ventricular Assist Device (Impella) Protects Against Acute Kidney Injury in Patients Undergoing High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    Flaherty, Michael P.
    Pant, Sadip
    Patel, Samir V.
    Kilgore, Tyler
    Dassanayaka, Sujith
    Loughran, John H.
    Rawasia, Wasiq
    Dawn, Buddhadeb
    Cheng, Allen
    Bartoli, Carlo R.
    CIRCULATION RESEARCH, 2017, 120 (04) : 692 - 700
  • [22] Prediction of survival of patients in cardiogenic shock treated by surgically implanted Impella 5+short-term left ventricular assist device
    Nersesian, Gaik
    Tschope, Carsten
    Spillmann, Frank
    Gromann, Tom
    Roehrich, Luise
    Mueller, Marcus
    Mulzer, Johanna
    Starck, Christoph
    Falk, Volkmar
    Schoenrath, Felix
    Potapov, Evgenij
    INTERACTIVE CARDIOVASCULAR AND THORACIC SURGERY, 2020, 31 (04) : 475 - 482
  • [23] The effectiveness and safety of the Impella ventricular assist device for high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions: A systematic review
    Ichou, Jamal Ait
    Larivee, Natasha
    Eisenberg, Mark J.
    Suissa, Karine
    Filion, Kristian B.
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2018, 91 (07) : 1250 - 1260
  • [24] Treatment With Impella Increases the Risk of De Novo Aortic Insufficiency Post Left Ventricular Assist Device Implant
    Rao, Sriram D.
    Johnson, Bryce
    Olia, Salim E.
    Wald, Joyce
    Medina, Venessa
    Rame, J. Eduardo
    Mazurek, Jeremy A.
    Goldberg, Lee R.
    Atluri, Pavan
    Bermudez, Christian
    Acker, Michael
    Birati, Edo Y.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC FAILURE, 2020, 26 (10) : 870 - 875
  • [25] Pitfalls due to improper positioning of Impella®CP device for left ventricular support: a case series
    Abdalwahab, Ahmed
    Ismail, Ahmed Abdelaziz
    Hammad, Yahya Mohamed
    ANAESTHESIA PAIN & INTENSIVE CARE, 2025, 29 (01) : 119 - 123
  • [26] Advanced Preconditioning: Impella 5.5 Support for Decompensated Heart Failure Before Left Ventricular Assist Device Surgery
    Konig, Tobias
    Hanke, Jasmin S.
    Dogan, Guenes
    Kempf, Tibor
    Sieweke, Jan-Thorben
    Schaefer, Andreas
    Bauersachs, Johann
    Schmitto, Jan D.
    Napp, L. Christian
    CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE, 2021, 28 : S189 - S192
  • [27] Is the Thoratec® paracorporeal ventricular assist device a primary or secondary device to support patients with refractory cardiogenic shock?
    Aissaoui, Nadia
    Diebold, Benoit
    Fagon, Jean-Yves
    Leprince, Pascal
    ARCHIVES OF CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES, 2009, 102 (6-7) : 473 - 475
  • [28] Initial experiences with the Impella device in patients with cardiogenic shock - Impella support for cardiogenic shock
    Meyns, B
    Dens, J
    Sergeant, P
    Herijgers, P
    Daenen, W
    Flameng, W
    THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGEON, 2003, 51 (06) : 312 - 317
  • [29] Mechanical circulatory support for the right ventricle in combination with a left ventricular assist device
    Shimada, Shogo
    Nawata, Kan
    Kinoshita, Osamu
    Ono, Minoru
    EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES, 2019, 16 (08) : 663 - 673
  • [30] Insertion of Impella 5.0 to Improve Candidacy for HeartMate II Left Ventricular Assist Device Placement
    Rajagopalan, Navin
    Yanagida, Roh
    Hoopes, Charles W.
    JOURNAL OF INVASIVE CARDIOLOGY, 2014, 26 (04) : E40 - E41