The Effects of the Nurse Navigation Program in Promoting Colorectal Cancer Screening Behaviors: a Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:12
作者
Temucin, Elif [1 ]
Nahcivan, Nursen O. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hlth Sci, Nursing Fac, Oncol Nursing Dept, Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Istanbul Univ, Florence Nightingale Nursing Fac, Publ Hlth Nursing Dept, Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
Colorectal cancer; Cancer screening; Nurse navigation; Transtheoretical model; OCCULT BLOOD-TEST; PATIENT NAVIGATION; AFRICAN-AMERICANS; FOLLOW-UP; BARRIERS; STAGE; RISK; BREAST; INTERVENTIONS; PERCEPTIONS;
D O I
10.1007/s13187-018-1448-z
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Although screening programs are known and recommended for the early detection of colorectal cancer (CRC), the screening rates for the fecal occult blood test (FOBT) and colonoscopy are very low among adult individuals. Navigation programs, also known as individualized counseling, have recently begun to be used for increasing screening rates. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of the Nurse Navigation Program versus usual care on CRC screening participation and movement in stage of adoption for CRC screening and to examine perceived benefits of and barriers to CRC screening. This study was designed in line with a pre- and posttest two-group methodology. A total of 110 participants (55 nurse-navigated and 55 non-navigated patients) were studied. Data were collected using the following three tools: a sociodemographic information form, the Harvard Colorectal Cancer Risk Assessment Tool, and Instruments to Measure Colorectal Cancer Screening Benefits and Barriers. Following the Nurse Navigation Program, the FOBT (82 and 84%, respectively) and colonoscopy completion rates (15 and 22%, respectively) were significantly higher in the nurse-navigated group than in the non-navigated group at 3 and 6 months follow-up. Following the program, the benefit perceptions of the nurse-navigated group about CRC screening were improved, and their barrier perceptions were reduced. The results showed that the Nurse Navigation Program had significant effects on CRC screening behavior and health-related beliefs concerning CRC screening. Further assessment of the Nurse Navigation Program in different groups should be performed to observe its effects.
引用
收藏
页码:112 / 124
页数:13
相关论文
共 82 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2012, Globocan 2012: Estimated cancer incidence, mortality and prevalence worldwide in 2012
  • [2] [Anonymous], CANC SCREENING
  • [3] [Anonymous], COL CANC FACTS FIG 2
  • [4] [Anonymous], TURK CANC STAT
  • [5] [Anonymous], INT J HLTH SCI
  • [6] Once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening in prevention of colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised controlled trial
    Atkin, Wendy S.
    Edwards, Rob
    Kralj-Hans, Ines
    Wooldrage, Kate
    Hart, Andrew R.
    Northover, John M. A.
    Parkin, D. Max
    Wardle, Jane
    Duffy, Stephen W.
    Cuzick, Jack
    [J]. LANCET, 2010, 375 (9726) : 1624 - 1633
  • [7] Single flexible sigmoidoscopy screening to prevent colorectal cancer: baseline findings of a UK multicentre randomised trial
    Atkin, WS
    Cook, CF
    Cuzick, J
    Edwards, R
    Northover, JMA
    Wardle, J
    [J]. LANCET, 2002, 359 (9314) : 1291 - 1300
  • [8] INTERNATIONAL HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS Transforming Turkey's Health System - Lessons for Universal Coverage
    Atun, Rifat
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2015, 373 (14) : 1285 - 1289
  • [9] Client-directed interventions to increase community demand for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening
    Baron, Roy C.
    Rimer, Barbara K.
    Breslow, Rosalind A.
    Coates, Ralph J.
    Kerner, Jon
    Melillo, Stephanie
    Habarta, Nancy
    Kalra, Geetika P.
    Chattopadhyay, Sajal
    Wilson, Katherine M.
    Lee, Nancy C.
    Mullen, Patricia Dolan
    Coughlin, Steven S.
    Briss, Peter A.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2008, 35 (01) : S34 - S55
  • [10] Predictors of colorectal cancer screening behaviors among average-risk older adults in the United States
    Beydoun, Hind A.
    Beydoun, May A.
    [J]. CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL, 2008, 19 (04) : 339 - 359