Antecedents and consequences of team potency in software development projects

被引:56
作者
Akgun, Ali E. [1 ]
Keskin, Halit
Byrne, John
Imamoglu, Salih Z.
机构
[1] Gebze Inst Technol, Gebze, Turkey
[2] Pace Univ, Lublin Sch Business, New York, NY 10038 USA
关键词
group potency; team potency; project management; software development; product development;
D O I
10.1016/j.im.2007.08.001
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Developing new software quickly, successfully, and at low cost is critical in organizations. Ways of assessing the effectiveness of development teams has highlighted measures of factors, such as teamwork, group cohesiveness, and team integration, but the use of group potency theory (the collective belief of a group that it can be effective) is rare. In our study, we investigated antecedents of and consequences to group potency in software development project teams. By examining 53 software development project teams collected from small and medium-sized software firms in Turkey, we found, that team potency positively affected speed-to-market, development cost, and market success of the product. We also found that trust among project team members, past experiences of the members, and team empowerment had a positive impact on the team potency during the project. Managerial and theoretical implications are discussed. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:646 / 656
页数:11
相关论文
共 43 条
[21]   POTENCY IN GROUPS - ARTICULATING A CONSTRUCT [J].
GUZZO, RA ;
YOST, PR ;
CAMPBELL, RJ ;
SHEA, GP .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1993, 32 :87-106
[22]   De-escalation of commitment in software projects: Who matters? What matters? [J].
Heng, CS ;
Tan, BCY ;
Wei, KK .
INFORMATION & MANAGEMENT, 2003, 41 (01) :99-110
[23]   Motivation of software developers in Open Source projects: an Internet-based survey of contributors to the Linux kernel [J].
Hertel, G ;
Niedner, S ;
Herrmann, S .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2003, 32 (07) :1159-1177
[24]   Innovation, market orientation, and organizational learning: An integration and empirical examination [J].
Hurley, RF ;
Hult, GTM .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 1998, 62 (03) :42-54
[25]   An exploration of the relationship between software development process maturity and project performance [J].
Jiang, JJ ;
Klein, G ;
Hwang, HG ;
Huang, J ;
Hung, SY .
INFORMATION & MANAGEMENT, 2004, 41 (03) :279-288
[26]   Group potency and collective efficacy - Examining their predictive validity, level of analysis, and effects of performance feedback on future group performance [J].
Jung, DI ;
Sosik, JJ .
GROUP & ORGANIZATION MANAGEMENT, 2003, 28 (03) :366-391
[27]   Speeding up the pace of new product development [J].
Kessler, EH ;
Chakrabarti, AK .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCT INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 1999, 16 (03) :231-247
[28]   Powering up teams [J].
Kirkman, BL ;
Rosen, B .
ORGANIZATIONAL DYNAMICS, 2000, 28 (03) :48-66
[29]  
Larson C.E., 1989, Teamwork: what must go right, what can go wrong
[30]   Software developer perceptions about software project failure: a case study [J].
Linberg, KR .
JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE, 1999, 49 (2-3) :177-192