Antecedents and consequences of team potency in software development projects

被引:56
作者
Akgun, Ali E. [1 ]
Keskin, Halit
Byrne, John
Imamoglu, Salih Z.
机构
[1] Gebze Inst Technol, Gebze, Turkey
[2] Pace Univ, Lublin Sch Business, New York, NY 10038 USA
关键词
group potency; team potency; project management; software development; product development;
D O I
10.1016/j.im.2007.08.001
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Developing new software quickly, successfully, and at low cost is critical in organizations. Ways of assessing the effectiveness of development teams has highlighted measures of factors, such as teamwork, group cohesiveness, and team integration, but the use of group potency theory (the collective belief of a group that it can be effective) is rare. In our study, we investigated antecedents of and consequences to group potency in software development project teams. By examining 53 software development project teams collected from small and medium-sized software firms in Turkey, we found, that team potency positively affected speed-to-market, development cost, and market success of the product. We also found that trust among project team members, past experiences of the members, and team empowerment had a positive impact on the team potency during the project. Managerial and theoretical implications are discussed. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:646 / 656
页数:11
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   Improving risk management: moving from risk elimination to risk avoidance [J].
Adler, TR ;
Leonard, JG ;
Nordgren, RK .
INFORMATION AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY, 1999, 41 (01) :29-34
[2]  
Akgun A.E., 2002, EUROPEAN J INNOVATIO, V5, P117, DOI DOI 10.1108/14601060210436709
[3]   Emotions, trust and relationship development in business relationships: A conceptual model for buyer-seller dyads [J].
Andersen, Poul Houman ;
Kumar, Rajesh .
INDUSTRIAL MARKETING MANAGEMENT, 2006, 35 (04) :522-535
[4]   STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE - A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED 2-STEP APPROACH [J].
ANDERSON, JC ;
GERBING, DW .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1988, 103 (03) :411-423
[5]   ASSESSING CONSTRUCT-VALIDITY IN ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH [J].
BAGOZZI, RP ;
LI, YJ ;
PHILLIPS, LW .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1991, 36 (03) :421-458
[6]  
Bandura A., 1996, SOCIAL FDN THOUGHT A
[7]   INFLUENCE OF SELF-EFFICACY ON PERFORMANCE IN A COGNITIVE TASK [J].
BOUFFARDBOUCHARD, T .
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1990, 130 (03) :353-363
[8]   RELATIONS BETWEEN WORK GROUP CHARACTERISTICS AND EFFECTIVENESS - IMPLICATIONS FOR DESIGNING EFFECTIVE WORK GROUPS [J].
CAMPION, MA ;
MEDSKER, GJ ;
HIGGS, AC .
PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 1993, 46 (04) :823-850
[9]  
Chin W., 2001, PLS-Graph User's Guide: CT Bauer College of Business
[10]   SUCCESS FACTORS IN PRODUCT INNOVATION [J].
COOPER, RG ;
KLEINSCHMIDT, EJ .
INDUSTRIAL MARKETING MANAGEMENT, 1987, 16 (03) :215-223